Re: greedy/non-greedy regex assertions

2002-07-04 Thread Ashley Winters
On Thursday 04 July 2002 10:47 am, Larry Wall wrote: On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Ashley Winters wrote: So I'd guess that we just don't talk about :-1, but rather say that *$min..$max is naturally greedy, and as with any quantifier you write *$min..$max? to get minimal matching. I would

Re: greedy/non-greedy regex assertions

2002-07-04 Thread Ashley Winters
On Thursday 04 July 2002 11:07 am, Ashley Winters wrote: I would expect /a*1..2?/ to mean /[a*1..2]?/ just looking at it. How can ? ever mean non-greedy unless it follows a metachar [*+?]? Perhaps I can respond to my own question. In /.+?/ . is an assertion, + is an assertion, and ? is a

Re: greedy/non-greedy regex assertions

2002-07-04 Thread Larry Wall
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Ashley Winters wrote: : On Thursday 04 July 2002 10:47 am, Larry Wall wrote: : On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Ashley Winters wrote: : So I'd guess that we just don't talk about :-1, but rather say that : : *$min..$max : : is naturally greedy, and as with any quantifier you