On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:38:51 -0700, Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think it's the cleanest solution, but it works.
Just out of curiosity, what do you think would be a cleaner solution?
And why would one not want to implement such a solution instead?
// Carl
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005
Carl Msak writes:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:38:51 -0700, Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think it's the cleanest solution, but it works.
Just out of curiosity, what do you think would be a cleaner solution?
And why would one not want to implement such a solution instead?
I
Consider:
my $foo of Num where { 0 = $^n 10 };
Is the following also valid?
my $foo where { 0 = $^n 10 };
Or does that have to be like this?
my $foo of Scalar where { 0 = $^n 10 };
And can $_ be used instead of $^n?
Juerd
Juerd writes:
Consider:
my $foo of Num where { 0 = $^n 10 };
Is the following also valid?
my $foo where { 0 = $^n 10 };
I don't see why not. The main place Cwhere will be useful is in
multimethods, and I see that as a reasonable shorthand:
multi sub foo(Bar $x, $y where
Luke Palmer skribis 2005-01-28 9:31 (-0700):
And can $_ be used instead of $^n?
Of course it can. You know that.
I do?
Can't say I understand well when a topic is implicitly defined and when
not. It's obvious for for-loops and given, but everything else is
blurry to me.
Juerd
Juerd writes:
Luke Palmer skribis 2005-01-28 9:31 (-0700):
And can $_ be used instead of $^n?
Of course it can. You know that.
I do?
Can't say I understand well when a topic is implicitly defined and when
not. It's obvious for for-loops and given, but everything else is
blurry to
