Re: Perl 6 - Cheerleaders?

2001-10-31 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
John == John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John (Can I pre-order the Perl 6 Camel or what? ;) Of course. You'll almost certainly visit the nodes before the subnodes in the documentation. :-) -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 [EMAIL

Re: Constants

2001-10-31 Thread Aaron Sherman
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 04:15:46PM -0600, David M. Lloyd wrote: On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Damian Conway wrote: To me Cis const means: the *value* stored in the memory implementing this variable cannot be changed. Which doesn't preclude rebinding the variable to some *other* memory. But

Re: Constants

2001-10-31 Thread Damian Conway
Aaron mused: Then maybe we shouldn't call it 'is const'? Or maybe another tag is needed in addition, like 'is unbindable' for the latter case. Yes, I see the wisdom of not using const here, since it does carry SO MUCH baggage. final has Java baggage. only, stable, ro

Re: Perl 6 - Cheerleaders?

2001-10-31 Thread David Nesting
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 09:37:39AM -0500, Aaron Sherman wrote: : Yep, but in Perl5, this was never very clean or obvious to the : casual programmer. Constants have been coming of age in Perl, : and they're kind of scary if they're not constant. On one hand, one might say that a developer