On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Matt Diephouse wrote:
Or in Perl 5, which has to use 2 subs to have the same interface (code
^
^
Huh?!?
#!/usr/bin/perl -l
use strict;
use warnings;
sub extp ($@) {
my $t=shift;
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Michele Dondi wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Matt Diephouse wrote:
Or in Perl 5, which has to use 2 subs to have the same interface (code
^^^
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Larry Wall wrote:
: So what I would like to do is (i) Cmap the list of templates to a list
: of curried closures in which the first parameter is fixed to each given
: template, (ii) Creduce this list by means of right pipe binop
: ( C == ) with a starting value
Okay, it ought to be there soon. I added it in the New operators
section, since it's pretty different from =~.
That'd also be appropriate, but I didn't see an explicit mention anywhere...
Arguably the ~~ table should go in S3 instead of S4.
It most likely should, since ~~ is an operator,
Speaking of subs, and especially recursive ones which have been mentioned
en passant earlier, I have another question of mine: I know that in the
vast majority of cases this won't be useful in any way, but in the body of
a (possibly anonymous) sub/block, will there be some sort of identifier to
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 10:02:18AM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
: The new alternative is MY.sub. I suppose that could return the current
: actual sub, so if you're using a pointy sub you have to say MY.block or
: something. But it's one of those two.
Or something resembling them. I'm still pining
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 10:07:29AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
I like $-, $+, and $? the best. Probably should save $- and $+ for something
complimentary, which leaves $?. It's visually distinctive, and recently
came available. :-)
Speaking of which ... why is it that $?foo and ?foo became
Jonathan Scott Duff skribis 2004-09-16 13:44 (-0500):
Speaking of which ... why is it that $?foo and ?foo became $foo
and foo respectively?
perlcheat is one page. I hope that when Perl 6 is around, I can
summarize all uses of and on one page. The second page will be for
the rest of the
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 01:40:47PM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
: Larry Wall writes:
: I like $-, $+, and $? the best. Probably should save $- and $+ for something
: complimentary, which leaves $?. It's visually distinctive, and recently
: came available. :-)
:
: Hmm, $ is pretty good, and
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 01:44:03PM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
: On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 10:07:29AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
: I like $-, $+, and $? the best. Probably should save $- and $+ for something
: complimentary, which leaves $?. It's visually distinctive, and recently
: came
10 matches
Mail list logo
