On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
I like this in general. However...
Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Since we already stole angles from iterators, «$fh» is not
how you make iterators iterate. Instead we use $fh.fetch (or
whatever) in scalar context,
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Austin Hastings wrote:
How about just having C system() return a clever object with .output and
.err methods?
interesting...
Michele
--
Windows shuts down automaticaly giving an count down. what could be
the problem
Windows?
- Le TeXnicien de surface in comp.text.tex
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Larry Wall wrote:
Here's the proposal.
First the bad news:
* We accept that the C operator requires whitespace
around it, and be prepared to be burned in effigy occasionally.
My biggest worry about this is that people will be writing
if $x3
loop( $x=0 ;
John Williams writes:
Is all the Extensible metasyntax (...) being changed to ... ?
Or is the new rule that ... is capturing metasyntax, and ... is
non-capturing metasyntax?
That's the one.
You can't really capture anything on an assertion, so
/^foo .* ( do { say Got here! } or 1 ) .*
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 02:54:42PM -0700, John Williams wrote:
: Does / -alpha / capture to $0{'-alpha'} ?
: Or should that be written / -«alpha» / ?
At the moment I've got it that only assertions of the form word capture.
Anything else you have to do an explicit binding, or use :keepall.
Larry
