Jason ():
It makes sense to me to go with option 1; you get what you ask for. It also
makes sense to make to not use magical implied numbers, such as negatives,
to accomplish things that either ranges or whatever star can accomplish.
Aye, agreement. There's a whole lot of consensus already...
Ok, so 0 returns the empty list and -1 violates the signature? In PIR
can we have such signatures that put a constraint on the range of
values for a given parameter?
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Carl Mäsak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason ():
It makes sense to me to go with option 1; you get
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Chris Davaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so 0 returns the empty list and -1 violates the signature? In PIR
can we have such signatures that put a constraint on the range of
values for a given parameter?
Maybe this has already been proposed and rejected, but
