. The signature of initialize is used by Class.new in
Ruby; the signature of __init__ is used by class_name() in Python...
How is doing the same thing too much magic? Or am I misunderstanding
the suggestion?
On 8/19/09, Kevan Benson kben...@a-1networks.com wrote:
Should there not be a way to define object
Moritz Lenz wrote:
Kevan Benson wrote:
Should there not be a way to define object constructors with custom
signatures that can be usefully invoked like a normal constructor?
Currently, defining a BUILD method for a class with a specific signature
doesn't seem to allow for the object
Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Kevan Benson kben...@a-1networks.comwrote:
That said, I submit that it's a very confusing part of the language as
defined currently, and I haven't seen a very thorough explanation of the
purpose of each method in the chain
pattern for it (in addition to whatever specific functionality it
needs) makes sense, IMHO.
Doesn't it make sense to just make it a method for the class/role?
my Amazon $fn .= open($path-to-input-file-location/$file-name, :r) or
die $!;
--
Kevan Benson
A-1 Networks
