.
- sebastian
On 12/17/05, Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LP == Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
LP Actually, you can think of undef pretty much as defining
LP autovivification. If you use it as a number, it becomes a number; if
LP you use it as a string, it becomes a string
into
executing the sub in a try/catch such that if the undef error occurs,
undef is returned
- sebastian
On 12/16/05, Darren Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something else I've been thinking about, as a tangent to the
relational data models discussion, concerns Perl's concept of
undef, which I
) to
to define the behavior of all undefs declared within the
given scope. Since each undef is a magic object, it doesn't lose its
effect when undef variables are passed to methods enforcing different
undef behaviors because it carries the behavior from whence it was
defined.
On 12/16/05, Sebastian [EMAIL
or says. Looking for
some_code_like_this() in a place that uses some-code-like-this() might
be troublesome.
- sebastian
On 11/16/05, Daniel Brockman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not a Lisp weenie. However, I have always preferred
hyphens over underscores, and I have always preferred
identifiers
al). As long as p6
isn't taking away from any of the functionality or DWIMery I won't
have any objections
- Sebastian
I think it'd be great if +=, ~=, +=, ++, etc, could all assume $_ on
their LHS when there is no obvious operand.
It'd be nice to have these, but is it something that can wait? I
wouldn't mind if more effort was spent on other pieces if this can be
easily done in the future
- sebastian
Please let that the sigil looks like a certain leter not be a reason.
Juerd
They make for good mnemonics, which isn't necessarily a bad thing for
people coming from languages without them or with fewer
- sebastian
