Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and "Jeremy Howard" [EMAIL PROTECTED] whispered:
| No, neither proposal makes sense. Arrays can be stored compactly and
|
| $a[1_000_000_000] = 'oh, really?' # :-)
|
| my int @a: sparse;
| $a[1_000_000_000] = 'Yes, really!' # :P
|
| OK, so I cheated...
Stephen P. Potter wrote:
Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and "Jeremy Howard" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whispered:
| No, neither proposal makes sense. Arrays can be stored compactly and
|
| $a[1_000_000_000] = 'oh, really?' # :-)
|
| my int @a: sparse;
| $a[1_000_000_000] = 'Yes,
Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 08:37:21AM +1000, Jeremy Howard wrote:
Stephen P. Potter wrote:
Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and John Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whispered
:
| Here's a counter-proposal: throw out hashes as a separate internal
| data type, and
No, neither proposal makes sense. Arrays can be stored compactly and
$a[1_000_000_000] = 'oh, really?' # :-)
my int @a: sparse;
I see: you have a time machine and I don't. So very unfair...
$a[1_000_000_000] = 'Yes, really!' # :P
OK, so I cheated... I haven't submitted my RFC
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 05:55 PM 8/15/00 -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
No, neither proposal makes sense. Arrays can be stored compactly
and
$a[1_000_000_000] = 'oh, really?' # :-)
my int @a: sparse;
I see: you have a time machine and I don't. So very unfair...
Need
