On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 11:09:18AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Damian Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But I've gotta nitpick the name. I wonder if BLESS wouldn't be better?
print calls PRINT, printf calls PRINTF, even if the subs don't do any
printing. Sure makes it easier to
Given that is happens when bless is called and that all other builtin
methods are anmed after what is being called, not what it is being used
for, then I would say that it should be called BLESS for consistancy reason.
this may seem confusing because you are thinking of one
Damian, I think it would be worth at least mentioning BLESS and REBLESS
in an "Alternative Names" section in the RFC. Enough people have voiced
concerns over this that I think these two are worth putting in there.
As I mentioned in another message, I'll be doing that.
Then
Damian Conway wrote:
* invoke some other hierarchy of automagic methods
(REFIT? RESHAPE? MORPH? TRANSMOGRIFY?), or
REINCARNATE
