On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:41 AM, yary not@gmail.com wrote:
Perl is being actively developed for the Parrot VM. LLVM is another
interesting option and if someone or some group would like to take it
on, it would be a welcome alternate implementation.
What parts in particular of Cobra and
Aaron Sherman asked:
Should there be an explicit way to step this down to just parsing the bits
that are called out as pod?
The original conception allowed for Pod to be independent of the
interleaved language. That has now been supplanted by a model that views
Pod as an integral part of Perl.
Timothy ():
I'd actually be in favour of Masak's post being copied to the site
(with attribution) and expanded, rather than just linked, if Carl is happy
with the idea. [...]
I'd be honoured. In general, consider anything I write on use.perl to
be cc-attr-licenced.
Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 19:49 +1000, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
+1. I have a set of 7 bookmarks that load in tabs that I call my Perl 6
bookmarks. I load this group of tabs into a separate web browser window
when
I'm
Also any thoughts on implementing Perl 6 on LLVM?
Well, the planning is already under way...
Parrot want to eventually use LLVM as one of the possible backend:
http://wknight8111.blogspot.com/2009/09/first-steps-on-jit-overhaul.html
At the moment, it is targeted for the 2.6 release:
Thanks everyone for sharing the links...
Thought of working in porting Data::Dumper functionality in perl 6 .Seems
like already there is .perl function which does the same..
and a monker mberends said there is a bug in circular references ..
So i am thinking to get deep into the problem.
Was
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Saravanan T mail2sarava...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks everyone for sharing the links...
Thought of working in porting Data::Dumper functionality in perl 6 .Seems
like already there is .perl function which does the same..
and a monker mberends said there is a bug
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:05 AM, Damian Conway dam...@conway.org wrote:
Aaron Sherman asked:
...
I'd very much like to establish that at default optimization levels for
execution, this information is not guaranteed to be maintained past the
creation of the AST.
Unfortunately, it is. Perl 6
Matthew Walton wrote
Yes, Perl 6 does - it is not backwards compatible with Perl 5.
That so? I thought Perl6 was supposed to recognize and execute perl5
code. That statement itself implies that perl6 and perl5 are different
languages, and I'm not too interested in arguing over semantics. I am
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 11:12 -0700, yary wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:05 AM, Damian Conway dam...@conway.org wrote:
Aaron Sherman asked:
...
I'd very much like to establish that at default optimization levels for
execution, this information is not guaranteed to be maintained past the
yary asked:
Can some concept/implementation of $=POD lazyness only incur the
memory and performance hit on access?
IANAImplementor, but I suspect that virtually all of the performance hit
could be incurred at run-time, if it happened to be implemented that
way. The memory hit too, if
On behalf of the Rakudo development team, I'm pleased to announce
the September 2009 development release of Rakudo Perl #21 Seattle.
Rakudo is an implementation of Perl 6 on the Parrot Virtual Machine [1].
The tarball for the September 2009 release is available from
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 6:58 PM, yary not@gmail.com wrote:
Matthew Walton wrote
Yes, Perl 6 does - it is not backwards compatible with Perl 5.
That so? I thought Perl6 was supposed to recognize and execute perl5
code. That statement itself implies that perl6 and perl5 are different
I'll take a look at web.pm and see I can get involved. Would be
interesting to see if Catalyst is being ported over as well.
I see Perl 6 really taking off if the tools for server side scripting/
web development
get revamped to take on PHP's and Ruby's in terms of ease of use and
Not actually S26; but closely related: should $=POD and .WHY be
read-only? Also, should there be other Pod variables besides $=POD?
If so, which ones?
Back on the subject of S26: should declarator blocks and aliases be
able to introspect the object with which they're associated? That is,
should
15 matches
Mail list logo
