What is Camel4 going to look like for perl 6? What is going to be required
knowledge for perl6. Let's just start by looking at Apoc2. To use perl,
you'll have to know Unicode, you'll have to know OO, you'll have to
understand references. Those are three very technical concepts that make
In this thread I've heard both perl6 is too different from perl5 and
perl6 is too similar to perl5, without anybody naming the specific
things that are problems and suggesting solutions.
The old adage about programmers being like cats, constantly at the
wrong side of the door, or at the both
If you talk that way, people are going to start believing it. The
typical Perl 6 program is not going to look very different from the
typical Perl 5 program. The danger of us continually talking about
the things we want to change is that people will forget to notice the
tremendous amount
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 02:43:14PM -0800, Peter Scott wrote:
At 05:30 PM 2/20/01 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 02:15 PM 2/20/2001 -0700, Nathan Torkington wrote:
Bryan C. Warnock writes:
Ask, all, are we reusing perl6-rfc as the submittal address, or will there
be a new one (perl-pdd)?
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:47:12PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
As an active non-smoker, I'd appreciate a different name.
Likewise. What's wrong with builders?
-- Johan
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 11:48:27PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 08:57:02PM -0500, Bryan C . Warnock wrote:
Particularly after this:
http://news.cnet.com/investor/news/newsitem/0-9900-1028-4825719-RHAT.html?tag=ltnc
"Innovation-- you keep using this word, I do
Comparing the perl6-language and the perl5-porters simply doesn't fly.
It's not even comparing apples and oranges, it's like comparing
a busy market place and a faculty lunch.
In the first case we are talking about a crowd of people most of which
do not know each other, do not know what the
I agree partly, but not fully.
Where I agree is that we did a lousy job in having tighter control by
not requiring authors to record the opposing opinions or pointed out
deficiencies, not requiring more work on the implementation side, not
bestowing more power to the chairs/moderators, and so
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 03:42:41PM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Nathan Torkington wrote:
When an article
in perl.com is so overwhelmingly negative about the work so far, do
Yup. I can't see www.sun.com carrying an
http://www.bsdtoday.com/2000/October/News306.html
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 04:35:42PM -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
http://www.bsdtoday.com/2000/October/News306.html
Oops, sorry about that, didn't read Ziggy's message first...
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 03:56:00AM -0700, Carlos Ramirez wrote:
Here's a listing of 'recommended reading' gathered from this list
(provided by Nat). I'm not sure if this will be a permanent place for
this link, but for now you can get it here. If i left out a book or if
you have a new
12 matches
Mail list logo
