On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:38:03PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 07:20 PM 2/19/2001 -0800, Edward Peschko wrote:
RFC 362
---
=head1 TITLE
The RFC project should be ongoing and more adaptive.
It's my understanding that this is, in fact, the plan. The only reason
things have
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Sugalski" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Edward Peschko" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, strict, and
CPAN)
..we're waiting
for Larry..
yep
On Tuesday 20 February 2001 16:51, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Honestly, the PDDs are for the stuff that was implemented, not the stuff
that was decided. Or, more clearly, PDDs describe the implementation or
proposed implementation at the internals level. RFCs are for
language-level
features.
It
