J. David Blackstone writes:
> I think the success criteria on http://dev.perl.org/pm/pos.html
> should be more measurable.
You're right. I was happy to have simply avoided "better" and "good",
the classic unmeasurable words :-) I kept "faster" and "easier", two
similarly unpinnable words, th
J. David Blackstone writes:
> Wait. Does a good idea have to go away simply because the person
> who originally proposed it no longer has interest? What if several
> people are interested, but the original author has totally skipped out
> on Perl6 development, and the other interested people d
Larry's going to release a draft of his langauge decisions on the 1st
of October.
My plan to prevent a flood of 100 new RFCs on September 30:
- deadline for new RFCs of Sep 25. After that, only discussion of
old ones.
- send mail to existing authors of "developing" RFCs telling them
t
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 10:28:28PM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> Larry's going to release a draft of his langauge decisions on the 1st
> of October.
>
> My plan to prevent a flood of 100 new RFCs on September 30:
>
> - deadline for new RFCs of Sep 25. After that, only discussion of
>o
Michael G Schwern writes:
> There's a good chunk of people who are working on things for
> YAPC::Europe at the moment and Sept 25th happens to coincide with
> about when everyone will be staggering back. To avoid having to
> choose between spending the next week working on YAPC or working on
> Pe
