On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 11:58:07AM -0400, Adam Turoff wrote:
It's not so much that Perl shouldn't have data structures or modules.
I think what Stephen is saying (and he's not the only one) is that
the bare minimum amount of Perl you *must* know to be productive
is increasing. Either that,
Hmmm...ok, on thinking about it, I generally agree with you.
There is only one point that I would debate (and, as you'll see, there's
a solution for that one, too):
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Nathan Torkington wrote:
Dave Storrs writes:
1) One of the great strengths of Perl is that
LOL!
No bias there then Nat :-)
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Nathan Torkington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 10:41 PM
Subject: Re: Perl, the new generation
Stephen P. Potter writes:
It seems to me that recently (the last two years or so)
On Thu 17 May, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 11:58:07AM -0400, Adam Turoff wrote:
It's not so much that Perl shouldn't have data structures or modules.
I think what Stephen is saying (and he's not the only one) is that
the bare minimum amount of Perl you *must* know to
