people (more unknowns, as it were, as most of
the established community is here already) had more things to say, but
you'll filter out discussions by people you don't recognize?
(I understood your point. This was just an interesting way of
presenting it.)
--
Bryan C. Warnock
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
answered,
as opposed to ignored or flamed. Hint hint.)
--
Bryan C. Warnock
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message -
From: "Nathan Torkington" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not only is it wrong, it's also hurting our chances. When an article
in perl.com is so overwhelmingly negative about the work so far, do
you think that stirs confidence in what we're doing? Do you think
that people
the attachment, which is a skeleton PDD.)
=head1 TITLE
Perl Design Documents
=head1 VERSION
=head2 CURRENT
Maintainer: Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Class: Meta
PDD Number: TBD
Version: 2
Status: Proposed
Last Modified: 9 February 2001
PDD Format: 0
Language
ability" is now "stagnatation."
Microsoft's PR department just earned their paychecks. More, more, more
useless things.....
--
Bryan C. Warnock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is Perl6. Until that shows fruit, we'd be
very unlikely to tip more money in the way of perl6.
Good luck getting blood from a ston^W^W^W^W money from Microsoft :-)
Particularly after this:
http://news.cnet.com/investor/news/newsitem/0-9900-1028-4825719-RHAT.html?tag=ltnc
--
Bryan C. Warnock
documentation.
Lest the architect say, "Build me a house", and then complain that we don't
match the plans he never gave us.
--
Bryan C. Warnock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
go with mulitple documents, is the numbering scheme concurrent?
I'm also thinking heavily about change requests, and whether they should be
separate, or a stage beyond Standard. Pros and cons welcome.
--
Bryan C. Warnock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, if we put too much structure in place, no one will use it, and
we'll either see more non-experimental Experimental PDDs, or no PDDs at all.
That's a good idea, but I'm not entirely convinced that it's the
only one, the fairest one or the most practical one.
I'm all ears. Er... eyes.
--
Bryan C. Warnock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e question of why seperate them in the first
place.
--
Bryan C. Warnock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mpany" as a suggestion, withhold your
email - I'm considering it.
Thanks,
--
Bryan C. Warnock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
^
(To be fair, this is currently in the "working" stage, so please hold
judgement in reserve.)
On Wednesday 16 May 2001 15:32, Nathan Torkington wrote:
Bryan C. Warnock writes:
I think the biggest fear isn't that Perl is going to grow out of its
niche, but that it's going to outgrow it. It's great that Perl has been
able to expand to be so many things to so many people
.
Of course, this is probably an impractical posting - if folks wanted the
summary, why would they be subscribed to an actual list? But if you are,
there you go. And Simon, if you're out there, I'm looking for you.
(Or did I miss something?)
--
Bryan C. Warnock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Duty calls. Can someone pick up the summary for this and the next couple of
weeks? Email Simon for details. Thanks,
--
Bryan C. Warnock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and Exegesis 3 were expected five weeks ago. Where are we now?
--
Bryan C. Warnock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
15 matches
Mail list logo