Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?

2000-08-15 Thread Tim Bunce
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 11:30:28AM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote: > > I'll just make up some alternatives for everyone to shoot at: > > use Foo;# like CGI.pm, morphs on demand > > use Foo;# procedural Foo > use OOFoo;

Re: How to implement both object->method and module::function interface?

2000-08-16 Thread Tim Bunce
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 04:59:19PM -0800, Michael Fowler wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 12:33:15PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 11:30:28AM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote: > > > use Foo;# like CGI.pm, morphs on demand >

Re: Perl 6 modules plan

2001-08-13 Thread Tim Bunce
On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 02:31:47PM -0400, Kirrily Robert wrote: > Ask wrote: > >On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Kirrily Robert wrote: > > > >[...] > >> =head2 The role of CPAN > >> > >> Will CPAN's role remain unchanged? Will there be a separate space for > >> Perl 6 modules (6PAN)? > >> > >> If we do want t

Re: Perl 6 modules plan

2001-08-14 Thread Tim Bunce
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 10:45:27AM +0100, Graham Barr wrote: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 07:20:11PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 02:16:49PM -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > > One silliness is that the implementation "style" of the module > > > seems to creep to the

Re: Perl 6 modules plan

2001-08-14 Thread Tim Bunce
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 10:02:29AM -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 09:46:13AM -0500, Garrett Goebel wrote: > > From: Jarkko Hietaniemi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Remember, the goal for Perl 6 is to allow several modules sharing > > > the same name. > > > > D