* Juerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-18 14:10]:
pugs my @foo = 1, 2, 3, { 4 if 0 }.(), 5; say @foo.perl
[1, 2, 3, 5]
bool::true
pugs my @foo = 1, 2, 3, { 4 if 1 }.(), 5; say @foo.perl
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
bool::true
That’s “conceptually noisy” though… I don’t know if I’d
Hi Stuart,
* Stuart Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-18 15:05]:
On 6/18/06, A. Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a construct in Perl 6 to express this more
immediately? Something along the lines of the following would
seem ideal:
$foo, $bar, ( $baz if $wibble ), $quux
How
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 05:18:14PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
pugs sub infix:pv($x, $cond) { $cond ?? ($x,) !! () }; say 1, 2, (3 pv
1), 4
However, what are the evaluation semantics here? Neither the
ternary nor the `if`-based solutions evaluate the expression they
return if the
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 05:18:52PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
: Maybe TheLarry can enlighten us… :-)
We already have the operator you want. It's spelled Cxx?. :-)
Larry
* Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-18 19:05]:
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 05:18:52PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
: Maybe TheLarry can enlighten us… :-)
We already have the operator you want. It's spelled Cxx?. :-)
Nice. :-) How’s it used? S03 doesn’t list it.
Regards,
--
#Aristotle
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 07:27:57PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
: * Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-18 19:05]:
: On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 05:18:52PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
: : Maybe TheLarry can enlighten us… :-)
:
: We already have the operator you want. It's spelled Cxx?. :-)
:
:
* Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-18 19:40]:
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 07:27:57PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-18 19:05]:
We already have the operator you want. It's spelled Cxx?.
:-)
Nice. :-) How’s it used? S03 doesn’t list it.
Nope. Doesn't
