Re: How to push a hash on an array without flattening it to Pairs?

XXX in the following to make it real? $ 6 'my %h = a => 42, b => 666; dd $_ for %h,XXX' Hash %h = {:a(42), :b(666)} :a(42) :b(666) Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>

Re: How to push a hash on an array without flattening it to Pairs?

ening? Even Perl 5 is nicer in that situation… -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>

Re: Definitions: compiler vs interpreter [was: Rationale for a VM + compiler approach instead of an interpreter?]

) that itself interprets another program (the optree), which in turn was compiled from the user Perl program earlier on. Once you stop trying to artificially force everything into a single absolute distinction, the entire debate about which is which vanishes. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // http

Definitions: compiler vs interpreter [was: Rationale for a VM + compiler approach instead of an interpreter?]

, and that they are more or less the only real examples of such. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/

Re: Converting a Perl 5 pseudo-continuation to Perl 6

* Aristotle Pagaltzis pagalt...@gmx.de [2009-01-02 23:00]: That way, you get this combination: sub pid_file_handler ( $filename ) { # ... top half ... yield; # ... bottom half ... } sub init_server { # ... my $write_pid

Re: Converting a Perl 5 pseudo-continuation to Perl 6

$write_pid = pid_file_handler( $optionspid_file ); become_daemon(); $write_pid(); # ... } Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/

Guido’ s library porting considerations

that makes sense to encourage for 5-to-6 migrations of Perl code as well? Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/