Juerd schrieb:
* Markdown does not have tables.
* Textile does not have paragraphs in table cells.
* Kwiki does not have paragraphs in table cells.
Unless someone comes up with another way to do side-by-side layouts
(extremely useful for showcasing differences between Perl 5 and Perl 6),
Damn, forgot the link.
Thomas Wittek schrieb:
That's mainly what I did as stated in my first post[1]. [...]
[1]:
news://nntp.perl.org:119/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas Wittek wrote:
Good ideas. But maybe we should start a bit smaller ;)
It might be a good idea to create a list of features separated in
several increments (releases) to get a running system early.
Absolutely.
I could imagine increments like Parsing/Converting, Storage
* Thomas Wittek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-06-03 22:30]:
Interestingly it is very similar to Markdown although I never
heard about it before :)
Hmm, it doesn’t look similar at all to me? Not even superficially
similar, but most importantly, it looks line-based. Markdown is
block-based. If you want
On Jun 1, 2006, at 6:45, Ovid wrote:
In any event, if you can come up with a solid set of contest rules,
TPF can consider whether or not we can officially run the contest.
It sounds like a nice idea, I just don't know what's involved.
I wouldn't claim to entirely comprehend the rules,
Hi,
Hi Conrad,
I run the grant committee for the Perl Foundation and I sit on the steering
committee, so I suppose I can discuss your proposal (there are some other TPF
folk here, too, so that's why this is a public email). Also, the following
stuff is just off the top of my head and is in
Darren Duncan skribis 2006-05-28 14:37 (-0700):
For one thing, I'm assuming that a prize-qualifying solution won't be
able to link-in legacy Perl 5 modules using Pugs' use perl5:Foo
syntax; to do so would look bad if we are wanting to show off a Wiki
solution using the NEW technology.
I'm
I'm wondering about some implementation logistics.
For one thing, I'm assuming that a prize-qualifying solution won't be
able to link-in legacy Perl 5 modules using Pugs' use perl5:Foo
syntax; to do so would look bad if we are wanting to show off a Wiki
solution using the NEW technology.
-Original Message-
From: Amir E. Aharoni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 1:54 PM
[...]
It's funny - i was the first one who proposed the wiki idea and i
didn't think that it will go so far (1000$$$). If you ask me, this
wiki should be done ASAP in Media-Wiki.
