On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 00:32, C Bobroff wrote:
I'm so glad you also now see that to *forbid* marking ezaafe in personal
names is absurd.
Connie, Please! You really don't see the point? We are not documenting
practice in the locale spec, we are *specifying* a single way to do
things. People are
On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 21:49, Peyman wrote:
After resolving this issue, I try to go through the nice draft and
give my suggestions if any.
We would appreciate suggestions, independent of whether this issue gets
resolved or not.
roozbeh
___
Dear Roozbeh,
In page 2 (physical page 3) of the Locale draft, the short format
locale is specified in a table with some examples and explanation. The
missing information is this:
We know that the correct way to read (pronounce) a short format date
that looks like 1358/1/12 is 12-e Farvardin-e
On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 18:41, Hooman Mehr wrote:
[...] The best solution in my opinion is to provide exact format strings (as
arrays of Unicode characters with specific placeholders for date
elements). This will avoid any possible ambiguity in the specification.
That will be specified in a
