...). Now both MS Windows and Red Hat Linux ship with those fonts.
Oh, so THAT'S what the plan was. Very nice!
-Connie
___
PersianComputing mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sharif.edu/mailman/listinfo/persiancomputing
In
countries like Iran where the availability of source can be a great
teaching resource to students in schools and universities, it does a
lot more good than perceived harm.
Did you see this video?
http://www.science-arts.org/src/story/presentations/video/all.ram
It's old (2001) but it
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 23:28, C Bobroff wrote:
In this case, I just don't want to think about the
people who will download the new Koodak for free and sell it for a nice
profit. Not fair to the Farsiweb team nor the person who first made
Koodak.
But fair if, say, the developers allow it to
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 18:43, Skip Tavakkolian wrote:
Can someone produce a BDF version?
The question is: why do you need one?
roozbeh
___
PersianComputing mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sharif.edu/mailman/listinfo/persiancomputing
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 18:45, C Bobroff wrote:
There is already a font called Koodak. Won't users (and their computers)
have a problem when they THINK they are seeing this font but it's really
the old one? It won't occur to them to download the new one.
The point is, this is exactly just *that*
BSD style licenses all allow you to exploit the system commercially;
most people, however, choose to contribute their work back to the
community.
I see. That's nice if it works.
I didn't see a link from the index page at www.farsiweb.info to
the Koodak font. It might be convient to have one.
I see. That's nice if it works.
It works; witness: Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, XWindows, Apache, Cygwin, Perl,
MySQL, to name a few.
To be entirely accurate some of the above are GPL, which eventhough
puts no restrictions on commercial exploitation, requires the derived work
to be GPL also.
The point is, this is exactly just *that* Koodak, but only improved with
regard to Unicode compatiblity.
ok, I guess that is good to keep the exact name. Too bad the person who
drew the original outlines remains a mystery.
As for user (and computer ;)) education, that's not our expertise.
