and
let you know.
Best regards,
Peter E. Hauer
Linguasoft
Vienna, Austria
-Original Message-
From: Behnam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 11:55 PM
To: Linguasoft
Subject: Re: Nasta'aligh font
Thanks Peter,
It's more OTF than Unicode. The only glyphs in that font
On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 14:27, Behnam wrote:
Nasta'aligh font which was available at
http://www.crulp.org/ (which seems to be no more there)
Should be a server issue. I'm contacting the guys to ask.
I said it wasn't Unicode. Connie thought it was.
It is Unicode, it seems, but Pakistanis have
Hi Roozbeh,
A while back I had a heated discussion with Connie regarding Unicode
compatibility of Nasta'aligh font which was available at
http://www.crulp.org/ (which seems to be no more there) I said it
wasn't Unicode. Connie thought it was.
Since you just come from Lahore, you had a chance
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Behnam
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 11:58 AM
To: Roozbeh Pournader
Cc: Persian Computing Computing
Subject: Nasta'aligh font
Hi Roozbeh,
A while back I had a heated discussion with Connie regarding Unicode
compatibility of Nasta'aligh font which was available at
http
Thanks Peter,
It's more OTF than Unicode. The only glyphs in that font that have
Unicode code are the main alphabet. So it can't possibly work on a
word processor with Unicode support because non of other forms of the
characters (initial, medial etc.) are coded. But apparently OTF side of
it
