Re: PF extension for address/network tables

2003-01-01 Thread Damien Miller
Miles Sabin wrote: Daniel Hartmeier wrote, On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 12:25:57PM -0500, Michael Shalayeff wrote: if i'm not mistaken n is the address length there... so, regardless of the number of addresses in the set it's still a constant for each address family... Oh, my bad, so it's O(1)

Re: PF extension for address/network tables

2003-01-01 Thread Miles Sabin
Damien Miller wrote, Miles Sabin wrote: Just a suggestion ... Take a peek at ternary trees for this kind of thing, http://www.ddj.com/documents/s=921/ddj9804a/9804a.htm http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/bentley97fast.html Also the data structure described in:

pfradix/pfctl patch

2003-01-01 Thread Cedric Berger
Attached is a patch that fixes 3 problems Daniel found in pfctl_table.c Please also make sure you update net/pf_table.c to the latest version (version 9), sorry for that. Cedric --- pfctl-0.3/pfctl_table.c Wed Jan 1 19:58:07 2003 +++ pfctl-0.4/pfctl_table.c Wed Jan 1 22:54:49 2003

Re: pfradix/pfctl patch

2003-01-01 Thread Cedric Berger
Wrong list, Sorry guys, Cedric