Re: ALTQ ack prioritization

2003-03-07 Thread Henning Brauer
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 09:09:14PM -0500, Jason Dixon wrote: I forgot to mention, I'm running -snapshot from 3/2/03. It doesn't look like what happened to me was caused by any bugs (that Henning has mentioned in the meantime), but I'm curious... were any of those bugs fixed after my snapshot?

Re: ALTQ ack prioritization

2003-03-07 Thread Henning Brauer
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:40:31PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote: (pfctl.h ad pfctl_altq.c cheanged too) need more proofs I cannot type? *sigh* -- Henning Brauer, BS Web Services, http://bsws.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the

PF/NAT UDP fragment problem

2003-03-07 Thread Pete Toscano
I hope somebody here can help me with a PF/NAT problem I'm having. I'm moving a machine of ours from OpenBSD 2.9 to 3.2. This was all working with IPF running on the 2.9 install. The machine in question (nat) is working as a front for a DNS(SEC) server. It takes UDP or TCP packets to port 53

RE: intrusion detection

2003-03-07 Thread Adam Getchell
Just wanted to add a word of appreciation for pftop. Since I have a transparent bridge (which I didn't want to give an interface to), I just loaded Can's pftop package via floppy (14K) and it runs nicely. Not only is it great for looking at what people are doing on your network (well, I have 3000

Re: PF/NAT UDP fragment problem

2003-03-07 Thread Daniel Hartmeier
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 11:45:16AM -0500, Pete Toscano wrote: Anybody have any ideas? Am I using scrub incorrectly? Should I be using scrub? Is there something else I'm doing wrong? Is there any other potentially useful information I forgot to give? Your ruleset looks fine, that's exactly

Re: PF/NAT UDP fragment problem

2003-03-07 Thread Daniel Hartmeier
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:27:06PM -0500, Pete Toscano wrote: That's good to know. Would scrub in all work just as well as scrub in on {$ExtIf, $IntIf} all fragment reassemble? Yes, 'fragment reassemble' is the default, so both do the same thing (unless you have additional interfaces that you

Re: PF/NAT UDP fragment problem

2003-03-07 Thread Pete Toscano
On Fri, 07 Mar 2003, Daniel Hartmeier wrote: Your ruleset looks fine, that's exactly how it should work (rdr on external, nat on internal, scrub on both). That's good to know. Would scrub in all work just as well as scrub in on {$ExtIf, $IntIf} all fragment reassemble? It must be somehow

Re: Why isn't this port blocked?

2003-03-07 Thread Daniel Hartmeier
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 05:22:23PM -0500, Peter Gorsuch wrote: Connections to port 12002 occur between net2 and net3, which should only allow port 42. Show us the state entry (from pfctl -vvss output) that passes the connection, then the corresponding rule (pfctl -vvsr, for the rule number