Dom De Vitto wrote:
Damn straight.
That's 94% of wire speed!
But largely irrelevant, as it is packets per second and not bytes per
second that matter.
As it is probably interrupts that are loading the box and not packet
processing, you could perster tedu@ for his devpoll patch, but to quote
Henning/Daniel, is there any plans to implement polling in 3.4? Or have a
patch for it?
Amir Seyavash Mesry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LSI Logic Corporation
http://www.lsilogic.com/
Raid Support Test Technician
6145-D Northbelt Parkway
Norcross, GA 30071
678-728-1211
NOTICE: This communication
Damien Miller wrote:
I believe the fastest appliance out there currently is the Cisco PIX535,
coming in at a max of 1.7gb/s, but the other firewall appliances around
are way behind that and are well sub-1gb/s.
Nokia IP1260 w/FW-1 quotes 4.2Gbps
NetScreen 5400 quotes 12Gbps
You can find even
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:12:59AM -0400, Amir Seyavash Mesry wrote:
Henning/Daniel, is there any plans to implement polling in 3.4?
in 3.4 for sure not.
even later - nobody has yet shown that it pays out.
--
Henning Brauer, BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henning Brauer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:12:59AM -0400, Amir Seyavash Mesry wrote:
Henning/Daniel, is there any plans to implement polling in 3.4?
in 3.4 for sure not.
even later - nobody has yet shown that it pays out.
If anyone's interested I'm willing to test a patch (as long as
Hi Daniel, thanks for your quick answer, but I have tried fill the
ruleset name and the same error continues:
char anchorname[PF_ANCHOR_NAME_SIZE] = test;
char rulesetname[PF_RULESET_NAME_SIZE] = rl1;
strlcpy(add_rule.anchor, anchorname, PF_ANCHOR_NAME_SIZE);
strlcpy(add_rule.ruleset,
I figured out the problem. I need to initialize the ruleset before I can
add the 1st rule!
Gustavo Beltrami Rossi wrote:
Hi Daniel, thanks for your quick answer, but I have tried fill the
ruleset name and the same error continues:
char anchorname[PF_ANCHOR_NAME_SIZE] = test;
char
