If 'gwy' gets a packet from $client to $int_if, it will rdr and nat it so
that 'other' will receive a packet from $ext_if to $other, like so:
rdr $int_if from $client to $int_if - $other
nat $ext_if from $client to $other - $ext_if
int_if
client -- |gwy|
Hi,
I'm wondering if it's possible to define a user/group for rdr pass rules on
3.4.
Suppose this only-one-ruleset
rdr pass on $if proto tcp from any to $if port 21 - $if port 8021
Note: same interface, simply change the port.
If I'm not wrong rdr pass should create a state entry, so the
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 06:55:02PM +0200, Ed White wrote:
Request to introduce a public revision number to PF and pfctl.
no.
I had code doing this, and even pfctl erroring out with a nice message
if kernel and userland are out of sync, but theo refused it.
--
Henning Brauer, BS Web Services,
I had code doing this, and even pfctl erroring out with a nice message
if kernel and userland are out of sync, but theo refused it.
Why?
Julf
Monday, October 20, 2003, 7:44:52 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
Request to introduce a public revision number to PF and pfctl.
HB no.
HB I had code doing this, and even pfctl erroring out with a nice message
HB if kernel and userland are out of sync, but theo refused it.
That's strange. Why? I
