Re: PF tables states

2004-09-04 Thread Damien Miller
Ed White wrote: This is a message from an interesting thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=109422765506037w=2 In short the question is: why doesn't PF kill all the states associated with the tables entries when you flush a table ? For the same

Re: is amd64 a good choice ?

2004-09-04 Thread Richard Johnson
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As Cedric said, is amd64 better because it can use more than 768M for kernel memory ? Are there other advantages ? If you need something that will have a higher chance of working with your chosen hardware, in my experience the