Peter wrote:
--- Melameth, Daniel D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter wrote:
Question: Why does tcpdump show pf rules when I use the pflog0
interface in combination with the -e switch (link layer)? It's a
fantastic feature but it seems like an odd way to arrive at it.
rule
--- Melameth, Daniel D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter wrote:
Question: Why does tcpdump show pf rules when I use the pflog0
interface in combination with the -e switch (link layer)? It's a
fantastic feature but it seems like an odd way to arrive at it.
rule 0/(match) [uid 0, pid
On 15/01/06, ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another question, how do you associate the rule number to line in
pf.conf, without doing the obvious mental exercise, with many rules it
can be a chore.
have a look at pftop if you're not aware of it already, one of its
views will list rules and their
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:20:25 +
Karl O. Pinc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, pasted from the wrong window. This is the correct script.
On 01/15/2006 06:28:21 AM, ed wrote:
Another question, how do you associate the rule number to line in
pf.conf, without doing the obvious mental
Hi,
I am using IPSEC tunnels to connect my home office to our work site.
I am using a cisco voip phone which uses the vpn to talk to the call
manager.
I have worked for a bit to try to give the voip traffic highest priority
with ALTQ.
I have gotten some headway to what I want, but limitations
Adam Clark wrote:
Hi,
I am using IPSEC tunnels to connect my home office to our work site.
I am using a cisco voip phone which uses the vpn to talk to the call
manager.
I have worked for a bit to try to give the voip traffic highest priority
with ALTQ.
I have gotten some headway to what
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 04:19:10PM -0500, Peter wrote:
--- Melameth, Daniel D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter wrote:
Question: Why does tcpdump show pf rules when I use the pflog0
interface in combination with the -e switch (link layer)? It's a
fantastic feature but it seems like
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 05:43:49PM -0500, Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
Peter wrote:
--- Melameth, Daniel D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter wrote:
Question: Why does tcpdump show pf rules when I use the pflog0
interface in combination with the -e switch (link layer)? It's a
pf can filter fine on gif interfaces, including matching ToS. You have
to apply your rules on the gifN interface, e.g.
pass in on gif0 from any to any tos 0x08
Ahh, I assumed that because no traffic was listed when I tcpdump'd my
gif interface that nothing could be done about it. Its ok as
Hi, i have such problem.
I am using carp balancing on the gate to the Internet.
preempt=1
arpabalance=1
Firstly, on 3.8 arpbalansing didn`t work.
I saw this article
http://www.isi.qut.edu.au/people/mbradfor/openbsd-carp-arpbalance.html
I recompile the kernel with a patch IP-Based
Balancing.
Now
10 matches
Mail list logo