CARP and preempt buggy with wrong switches? Or carp bug?

2006-02-01 Thread Per-Olov Sjöholm
Hi I have seen strange issues with my firewall environment. It has the following 9 interfaces: Internet - em1 (dual intel pci-e) lan - em0 (dual intel pci-e) pfsync - em2 (dual intel pci-x) dmz1 - em3 (dual intel pci-x) dmz2 - bge0 (server build in broadcom) dmz3-6 - sis0-4 (soekris pci quad)

ssh bruteforce attempts and timeout of table w/ persist keyword

2006-02-01 Thread Tr0go
Hello Everybody, Faced like a lot of you with ssh bruteforce automated attempts on my OpenBSD 3.8 box, I searched the web to see what others did to protect themselves against this. I made the same, forbiding ssh connections with password and opting for public key authentication, but that was of

Re: ssh bruteforce attempts and timeout of table w/ persist keyword

2006-02-01 Thread Elijah Savage
Tr0go wrote: Hello Everybody, Faced like a lot of you with ssh bruteforce automated attempts on my OpenBSD 3.8 box, I searched the web to see what others did to protect themselves against this. I made the same, forbiding ssh connections with password and opting for public key

RE: CARP and preempt buggy with wrong switches? Or carp bug?

2006-02-01 Thread Steven S
I had a similar issue. I ended up using net.inet.carp.preempt=1 on the primary firewall and net.inet.carp.preempt=0 on the secondary. If the primary has an issue, the secondary becomes the master on all interfaces. I must confess I haven't fully tested the configuration. -Steve S. [EMAIL