Re: ssh bruteforce attempts and timeout of table w/ persist keyword

2006-02-02 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Tr0go [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is there a way to set timeout setting for a given pf table ? On my list of things to look into Real Soon Now is a utility which should fit the bill: expiretable. expiretable lives at http://expiretable.fnord.se/ and has made it into the ports system. -- Peter

Re: ssh bruteforce attempts and timeout of table w/ persist keyword

2006-02-02 Thread Tr0go
Thank you all for your good suggestions and explanations ! :-) I have a very long list mine has never blanked out. Matter of fact because of policy I started using cron to pipe it to a flat file and clear it out myself but before that I know I had 40 days or more of ip's in that list which

Re: ssh bruteforce attempts and timeout of table w/ persist keyword

2006-02-02 Thread Daniel Hartmeier
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:53:50AM +0100, Tr0go wrote: My ISP is resetting the line every 20 hours. So it run automatically ppp.linkdown which restart pf with new parameters as tun0 get a new IP address and pf rules need to be updated... and THAT is the problem. You're not running pfctl -Fa

Re: ssh bruteforce attempts and timeout of table w/ persist keyword

2006-02-02 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Tr0go [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My ISP is resetting the line every 20 hours. So it run automatically ppp.linkdown which restart pf with new parameters as tun0 get a new IP address and pf rules need to be updated... and THAT is the problem. Isn't that what the (interface) notation is supposed

PF allows for plugins in 3.9?

2006-02-02 Thread Magne J. Andreassen
Hi, a friend of mine said he had stumbled over a commit message about PF allowing for other applications to inspect packets on the fly. Can someone confirm this, or is he completely wrong? Magne

Re: CARP and preempt buggy with wrong switches? Or carp bug?

2006-02-02 Thread Per-Olov Sjöholm
top post... ok I *think* I have tracked it down... I had dmz4-dmz6 100% configured but no cables connected to the switch. The carp interfaces for them were in init state as they could not talk to each other. Although it all seemed to work as it should for all other interfaces. This means all

RE: CARP and preempt buggy with wrong switches? Or carp bug?

2006-02-02 Thread Steven S
Right. When preempt is set any carp interface which has a real interface down causes all carps to use 240 for the skew. At this point I think it is simply a race to see which interface takes MASTER. That is why I used preempt on only one FW. This insures that, in a situation like the one

RE: CARP and preempt buggy with wrong switches? Or carp bug?

2006-02-02 Thread Steven S
As I understand it, preempt is all or nothing. So if I have FW's configured like, ISP switch / \ | | FW1-- DMZ --FW2 [That's one DMZ switch] | switch | \ / LAN switch If I wish FW1 to be primary and FW2 to be secondary I set advskew on FW1 to be