On 7/17/06, Michal Soltys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Back to my point: with limited inbound traffic (by isp) to 1mbit, the
incoming traffic is just some traffic. If whatever comes in, assigned
to ext_bulk1 saturates a bit ext_bulk2 - total traffic will be still
1mbit, and there won't be any hmmm,
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 07:02:00PM -0500, Travis H. wrote:
On 7/15/06, Ryan McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Root can do stupid things which compromise security. Obfuscation or
needles complexity in an attempt to protect yourself from the root
account will only make your system less secure.
On 7/18/06, Can Erkin Acar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, needless complexity is a compile time option that makes it
impossible to know whether a given installation needs the block rule or not.
Good point.
packets are sent using bpf(4) so ruleset does not really matter.
Every day a school
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Can Erkin Acar wrote:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 07:02:00PM -0500, Travis H. wrote:
On 7/15/06, Ryan McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Root can do stupid things which compromise security. Obfuscation or
needles complexity in an attempt to protect yourself from the root
