Re: pf; XP firewall; and MS Remote Desktop

2006-04-05 Thread William Ross
At 10:00 AM 4/5/2006, you wrote: I am wondering whether the XP firewall could be to blame and why? Or is it just a coincidence and the latency is going to happen again in which case I am asking people what do they think I should look at? I have since begun making long term tcpdump captures

Re: OpenBSD PF firewall on linux

2006-02-18 Thread William Ross
At 03:01 AM 2/18/2006, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: You would either need to adjust to Linuxish tools, or swithch your laptop to either OpenBSD or FreeBSD (lots more packages available). A concerted effort to port pf to linux would be nice. That people continue to use ipchains drives me nuts.

Freebsd.org

2006-01-22 Thread William Ross
Anyone know what's going on with freebsd.org?

Re: Freebsd.org

2006-01-22 Thread William Ross
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 09:09:53 -0800 William Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: pf@benzedrine.cx Its back. Must have been an upgrade.

Re: Firewalling with PF, AUUG2005 edition

2005-10-22 Thread William Ross
This is nice, Peter. At 07:22 PM 10/17/2005, Peter wrote: I've updated the Firewalling with PF manuscript, mainly for the tutorial .. The updated versions are up at http://www.bgnett.no/~peter/pf/en/ - full text, html, English http://www.bgnett.no/~peter/pf/en/long-firewall.html - full

Re: IP accounting

2005-09-04 Thread William Ross
At 11:03 AM 9/4/2005, you wrote: How can free ram be greater than total ram? The free ram count includes swap space for some reason, whereas the total count only includes hardware?

Re: [Fwd: Problems with voip and state clashes]

2005-06-30 Thread William Ross
At 08:14 AM 6/29/2005, you wrote: No ideas? Even though most are using asterisk behind a nat with simple port forwarding, it looks like I am unable to do this with pf. I have grown to love pf so much it would be a shame to have to dump it on MY network :-( I've been tinkering with asterisk

Academic question on pf.conf

2005-04-11 Thread William Ross
In my rules section, if I have a first rule such that block on (external interface) all; Would that not make any following rules about spoofing and blocking rfc1918 nets redundant?

Re: Problems with PF

2005-04-11 Thread William Ross
At 01:20 PM 4/11/2005, Kimi Ostro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Apr 11, 2005 1:04 PM, Abdul Rehman Gani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: pass out quick on $ext_if from jamiat to any keep state queue jamiat_o # Do you REALLY need all those quick keywords in there? to be quite honest I am suprised if