[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PF sqawcks if a hostname in any of it's files are not currently
findable. Is there a reasonable way to have it gracefully skip missing
hosts and carry on?
Putting host names in your PF config files is a practice that comes with
warnings in large, friendly, red and
On Mon, 26 Feb 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PF sqawcks if a hostname in any of it's files are not currently
findable. Is there a reasonable way to have it gracefully skip missing
hosts and carry on?
So you firewall rules can be silently skipped during times of DNS outage
or DoS? That
On 02/26/2006 04:38:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PF sqawcks if a hostname in any of it's files are not currently
findable. Is there a reasonable way to have it gracefully skip
missing
hosts and carry on?
No. The best you can do is:
1) Do not use hostnames for hosts outside your DNS
Travis H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The TTL is controlled by the authoritative name server, though. And
what about dynamic DNS?
I wouldn't want to go there. The domain name system is fairly good at
what it was designed to do, unfortunately firewall configs did not enter
into the equation at
