Re: Per Packet Loadbalancing

--On 20. Mai 2005 09:45:19 +0100 Peter Galbavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would counter this by suggesting that once you set aside common HTTP connection, which is much of the public traffic now, many connections are long lived. Streaming, file transfer, VPNs etc. Yes espcialy VPN

Re: Per Packet Loadbalancing

Daniel Hartmeier wrote: I won't say your case of 'very few connections generating so many packets that they need balancing' is hypothetical, but it's certainly uncommon. Most people will have a smaller packets/connection rate and per-connection balancing works well enough. I would counter this

Re: Per Packet Loadbalancing

Thanks a lot for your reply. --On 19. Mai 2005 16:35:28 +0200 Daniel Hartmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: a) do the per-packet balancing on a dedicated box statelessly upstream of the stateful firewall I Think I'll stick with this option b) write a patch that does per-packet balancing

Re: Per Packet Loadbalancing

Jason Dixon wrote: Ah, ok. Thanks for clarifying. No, I think you're stuck with the per-session pool behavior you're currently seeing. To be quite honest though, given a long enough curve, won't it all theoretically balance out? If you are balancing across divergent paths (different ISPs or

Re: Per Packet Loadbalancing

Not if the lines are to be used for a few very bandwith intensive applications. --On 17. Mai 2005 11:54:06 -0400 Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 17, 2005, at 11:49 AM, Manon Goo wrote: Let me clarify my setup: OpenBSD-Box DSLGW DSLGW DSLGW DSLGW DSLGW DSLGW CiscoATM

Re: Per Packet Loadbalancing

I am not loadbalancing between dioffernet pathes. Both lines are attached to the same Router at my ISP. My ISP does per-packet loadbalnacing on the down stream. I need to do per packet loadbalancing on the Upstream --On 19. Mai 2005 19:24:43 +1000 Damien Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jason

Re: Per Packet Loadbalancing

On May 15, 2005, at 2:27 PM, Manon Goo wrote: Hello, I have posted this question to misc@openbsd.org before. Perhaps this is a better place to ask this question. I have a problem activating per packet loadbalancing with a keep state rule, I am getting per session loadbalancing. snip CARP

Re: Per Packet Loadbalancing

--On 17. Mai 2005 06:37:02 -0400 Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip CARP + arpbalance does per-packet load balancing at L2. This will not help me because my problem is with outbound traffic. Manon man 4 carp -- Jason Dixon DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net

Re: Per Packet Loadbalancing

On May 17, 2005, at 9:20 AM, Manon Goo wrote: --On 17. Mai 2005 06:37:02 -0400 Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip CARP + arpbalance does per-packet load balancing at L2. This will not help me because my problem is with outbound traffic. So setup CARP + arpbalance on your internal

Re: Per Packet Loadbalancing

On May 17, 2005, at 11:49 AM, Manon Goo wrote: Let me clarify my setup: OpenBSD-Box DSLGW DSLGW DSLGW DSLGW DSLGW DSLGW CiscoATM Router Internet The Inbound traffic is dirtributed by the CiscoATM Router. The packtes are routed round robin through my DSLGWs. This is solved.

Re: Per Packet Loadbalancing

snip CARP + arpbalance does per-packet load balancing at L2. This will not help me because my problem is with outbound traffic. So setup CARP + arpbalance on your internal interfaces. Let me clarify my setup: OpenBSD-Box DSLGW DSLGW DSLGW DSLGW DSLGW DSLGW CiscoATM Router

Per Packet Loadbalancing

Hello, I have posted this question to misc@openbsd.org before. Perhaps this is a better place to ask this question. I have a problem activating per packet loadbalancing with a keep state rule, I am getting per session loadbalancing. This rules does exactly the loadbalancing I want, every Packet