On Wednesday, December 13, 2006, at 15:59:02, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
OpenBSD has ifstated, which is pretty simple to configure
state engine.
it's true, but it's unusable here - if machine get 100% cpu load it
won't put down their interface. Also if you use load balancer almost
everytime you have
On 12/13/2006 09:40:03 AM, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote:
On Wednesday, December 13, 2006, at 15:59:02, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
OpenBSD has ifstated, which is pretty simple to configure
state engine.
it's true, but it's unusable here - if machine get 100% cpu load it
won't put down their
On Wednesday, December 13, 2006, at 09:20:11, pf@benzedrine.cx wrote:
I think that's the route we're going to take. I'm thinking about
writing a listener on all of the servers in the pool that report to a
server on the pf-enabled load balancers. The server would then
add/remove devices from
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote:
On Wednesday, December 13, 2006, at 15:59:02, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
OpenBSD has ifstated, which is pretty simple to configure
state engine.
it's true, but it's unusable here - if machine get 100% cpu load it
won't put down their interface.
