Re: Request for feature: queue assignment for back packets (Was: ACKs queueing)

* Federico Giannici [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-08 20:32]: I solved my case in a good way, but I'm currently not using states. I think that a general, intuitive and efficient solution could be useful. The problem: queue assignment of back packets of TCP flows when keep state is used and

Re: Request for feature: queue assignment for back packets (Was: ACKs queueing)

Henning Brauer wrote: * Federico Giannici [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-08 20:32]: I solved my case in a good way, but I'm currently not using states. I think that a general, intuitive and efficient solution could be useful. The problem: queue assignment of back packets of TCP flows when keep

Re: Request for feature: queue assignment for back packets (Was: ACKs queueing)

* Federico Giannici [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-09 12:51]: Henning Brauer wrote: * Federico Giannici [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-08 20:32]: I solved my case in a good way, but I'm currently not using states. I think that a general, intuitive and efficient solution could be useful. The

Request for feature: queue assignment for back packets (Was: ACKs queueing)

I solved my case in a good way, but I'm currently not using states. I think that a general, intuitive and efficient solution could be useful. The problem: queue assignment of back packets of TCP flows when keep state is used and queues are used in both directions. Currently the only solution