: Re: pf address pools
In some mail from Jedi/Sector One, sie said:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 11:59:37PM +, Ryan McBride wrote:
rdr on $ext_if from any to $public_ip port 80 - \
192.168.0.4/30 source-hash
As a side note, source-hash (a feature called 'sticky balancing' on
some
sorry, www.heise.de, not www.heisse.de !
- Original Message -
From: Stefan Sonnenberg-Carstens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Darren Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: pf address pools
So, do you think it might
[ wild cross-posting reduced to pf list ]
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 10:21:22AM +0100, Stefan Sonnenberg-Carstens wrote:
@Daniel Hartmeyer : is auto-detection of down hosts implemented in the
load-balancing code
in pf ?
No, that will be done by a userland daemon. As mentioned before, people
1:40 PM
Subject: Re: pf address pools
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Stefan Sonnenberg-Carstens wrote:
So, do you think it might be better to use ipfilter than pf on OpenBSD
in
that case ?
This feature (round-robin sticky) is not in ipfilter 3.4.30 (released
this week), so it's only available
