pfctl: DIOCADDALTQ: Device busy

2003-03-10 Thread Damien Miller
: DIOCADDALTQ: Device busy It disappears if I comment out the altq-related portion of my ruleset (which follow). What am I doing wrong? It seemed to work until a week or so ago. -d # Queuing altq on tun0 cbq bandwidth 50Kb queue { root, std, dns, http, mail, ssh } queue root bandwidth 100% cbq(default

Re: pfctl: DIOCADDALTQ: Device busy

2003-03-10 Thread Damien Miller
tbrsize 1500 queue { root std dns http mail ssh} queue root cbq( red ecn default ) { std dns http mail ssh } pfctl: DIOCADDALTQ: Device busy works here.. out of sync somewhere? No, I am definitely in sync and have just re-verified the problem using a GENERIC kernel. -d

Re: pfctl: DIOCADDALTQ: Device busy

2003-03-10 Thread Henning Brauer
: # pfctl -vf /etc/pf.conf [...] altq on tun0 cbq bandwidth 50Kb tbrsize 1500 queue { root std dns http mail ssh} queue root cbq( red ecn default ) { std dns http mail ssh } pfctl: DIOCADDALTQ: Device busy works here.. out of sync somewhere? No, I am definitely in sync and have just re

Re: pfctl: DIOCADDALTQ: Device busy

2003-03-10 Thread Damien Miller
to load my ruleset: # pfctl -vf /etc/pf.conf [...] altq on tun0 cbq bandwidth 50Kb tbrsize 1500 queue { root std dns http mail ssh} queue root cbq( red ecn default ) { std dns http mail ssh } pfctl: DIOCADDALTQ: Device busy works here.. out of sync somewhere? No, I am definitely in sync and have

Re: pfctl: DIOCADDALTQ: Device busy

2003-03-10 Thread Damien Miller
Henning Brauer wrote: On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 09:43:16PM +1100, Damien Miller wrote: Henning Brauer wrote: either you have more queuedefs you are hiding from us yes, you have. look, the error is obvious. Ah, ok. Has the checking been tightened? This worked for ages... the really right thing

Re: pfctl: DIOCADDALTQ: Device busy

2003-03-10 Thread Henning Brauer
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 10:06:55PM +1100, Damien Miller wrote: Henning Brauer wrote: On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 09:43:16PM +1100, Damien Miller wrote: Henning Brauer wrote: either you have more queuedefs you are hiding from us yes, you have. look, the error is obvious. Ah, ok. Has the