Re: nat and binat question

2006-05-16 Thread Per-Olov Sjöholm
Mipam wrote: Hi All, A small internal network is defined to be able to send traffic outside: outside = { a.b.c.d } special = { 10.23.145.10 } internal = { 10.23.145.0/24, !10.23.145.10 } nat on fxp0 from $internal to any - $outside binat on fxp0 from $special to any - $outside Meaning of

Re: nat and binat question

2006-05-16 Thread Mipam
On Tue, 16 May 2006, [ISO-8859-1] Per-Olov Sjöholm wrote: Mipam wrote: Hi All, A small internal network is defined to be able to send traffic outside: outside = { a.b.c.d } special = { 10.23.145.10 } internal = { 10.23.145.0/24, !10.23.145.10 } nat on fxp0 from $internal to

Re: authpf with time limited access?

2006-05-16 Thread Travis H.
On 5/10/06, Vas Péter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ooops. Well, it was quick and dirty. You'd have to figure out a way to kill logged in users too. This seems simple. pfctl -k a.b.c.d Also, I have a tool that lets you create firewall rules which time out at a particular time. It's called

home network

2006-05-16 Thread Terry
I'm a newbie at networking and I've been reading Building Firewalls with OpenBSD and PF and a couple of other resources. I have a pdf of how I'm thinking about setting up my home network. http://tyson.homeunix.org/net.pdf Page 2 gives the policies/functionality I would like to have. I want the

Re: pfstat 2.0

2006-05-16 Thread Jonas Davidsson
Daniel Hartmeier wrote: Here's a major update to pfstat. The most important changes: Im getting some very strange numbers out of this now, number of states for example, are shown to be around seven thousand in the graph, while pfctl shows only 680. Most other values are just plain off. The

Re: pfstat 2.0

2006-05-16 Thread Daniel Hartmeier
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 06:15:13PM +0200, Jonas Davidsson wrote: Im getting some very strange numbers out of this now, number of states for example, are shown to be around seven thousand in the graph, while pfctl shows only 680. Most other values are just plain off. That's via the remote TCP

Re: home network

2006-05-16 Thread Travis H.
On 5/16/06, Terry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Page 2 gives the policies/functionality I would like to have. I want the system to be secure but I would also like to be able to admin the system from the outside. You want your cake AND you want to eat it? Ambitious! Mostly, there is the threat of

Re: pfstat 2.0

2006-05-16 Thread Daniel Hartmeier
Thanks for the feedback! An update is on http://www.benzedrine.cx/pfstat-2.1.tar.gz MD5 (pfstat-2.1.tar.gz) = 82bcef47cca25b3ff28a4628ccaee26b * properly count line numbers when parsing configuration file, so syntax error messages refer to the appropriate line * support # comments in the

Re: home network

2006-05-16 Thread Terry
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:41:51AM -0500, Travis H. wrote: You want your cake AND you want to eat it? Ambitious! Perhaps a little too ambitious for my level of experience. ;p snip Thanks for the input. I think I'll simplify the plan a little till I can get more experience with pf. -- Terry