cell-X wrote:
Good day,
I haven't seen this question thrown in here or the openbsd list but
how can you make a openbsd PF firebox allow PPTP passthrough and IPSEC
passthrough like Linksys and SMC routers? I know that you can do PPTP
one-to-one map but the connections are going to be going
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Cammarata writes:
...This of course has many
inherent risks so it's definitely just a thought right now, but Cisco does
it and I'll be damned if they do something we can't do ;)
Just becuase Cisco is doing doesn't mean they are doing it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mathieu Sauve-Frankel) wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 01:13:47PM -0700, Chris Golubski wrote:
The message I continually get on both for both the external and
internal interface is duplicate IP address 10.0.0.1 sent from
ethernet address
Petr Ruzicka writes:
No, you would be suprised.
No, I wouldn't. I've worked with enough of them to know.
I also know that as one I would prefer not to have the security
disadvantage of an html interface.
I have spoken to a lot of IT managers, CSO
etc. and they would choose former.
I'm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mathieu Sauve-Frankel) wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 01:13:47PM -0700, Chris Golubski wrote:
The message I continually get on both for both the external and
internal interface is duplicate IP address 10.0.0.1 sent from
ethernet address
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 10:13:42AM -0700, Chris Golubski wrote:
boxes insist on keeping a status of MASTER on CARP0. My hostname.carp0
looks like this on both machines (with differing vhids):
The vhid has to be the same on all machines taking part in the same
virtual host.
On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 01:25, Petr Ruzicka wrote:
No, you would be suprised.
no I wouldn't ;)
I have spoken to a lot of IT managers, CSO
etc. and they would choose former. No matter what I say, no matter what
I do and use, lots of them will choose gui/html over ssh/vi...
Some people just do
