which is not the best idea for balancer.
That's why I monitor all services on different host and try not to
give more job to balancers ;)
Anyway, thanks for your reply, Daniel.
--
Sylwester S. Biernacki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-NET, http://www.xnet.com.pl/
or OpenBGPD,
so that's not that case.
--
Sylwester S. Biernacki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-NET, http://www.xnet.com.pl/
anything...
--
regards,
Sylwester S. Biernacki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-NET, http://www.xnet.com.pl/
help would be
greatly appreciated.
I will tell you exactly the same as Daniel wrote to me when I asked
for it: what for? shell scripts+pfctl is good enough ;-)
anyway, if you find anything worthing look at it, please let me know
;)
--
Sylwester S. Biernacki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-NET, http
2 or more servers in server farm behind load
balancer so you don't connect load balancer to servers in server farm
via cross-over cable ;P
IMHO the solution for such config is not to use OSI Layer 1 and 2, but
3 4 :)
--
Sylwester S. Biernacki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-NET, http://www.xnet.com.pl/
to the list if there's enough
interest.
If I can help in that case please let me know :)
--
Sylwester S. Biernacki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-NET, http://www.xnet.com.pl/
On Wednesday, December 13, 2006, at 17:14:39, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 12/13/2006 09:40:03 AM, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote:
On Wednesday, December 13, 2006, at 15:59:02, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
OpenBSD has ifstated, which is pretty simple to configure
state engine.
it's true, but it's
virtual
#httpd_accel_port 80
#httpd_accel_with_proxy on
#httpd_accel_uses_host_header on
Daniel: can you change it also at your page to cover that ?
--
Sylwester S. Biernacki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-NET, http://www.xnet.com.pl/
that will work now, but my scenario was good year
ago and I haven't changed it (old IT rule: if sth works well don't
touch that :-))
regards,
--
Sylwester S. Biernacki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-NET, http://www.xnet.com.pl/
