I have a MySQL database that I'm converting to PostgreSQL which has 10 columns
with TINYINT type, i.e., a one-byte integer. Only one of them qualifies as a
true BOOLEAN. Two are entity identifiers (for limited range classes or
categories) and three others are type/code values. The last four
On Jul 12, 2005, at 1:16 AM, Joe wrote:
I have a MySQL database that I'm converting to PostgreSQL which has
10 columns with TINYINT type, i.e., a one-byte integer. Only one
of them qualifies as a true BOOLEAN. Two are entity identifiers
(for limited range classes or categories) and
David Esposito [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As promised, here are two runs of VACUUM VERBOSE on the problem table ...
There was a lot of activity on the campaign_email table on Friday
(Saturday's VACUUM) as compared with Monday (Tuesday's VACUUM)
Well, what these numbers show is that you have 5%
Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a MySQL database that I'm converting to PostgreSQL which has 10
columns
with TINYINT type, i.e., a one-byte integer.
I'm wondering what would be the best conversion choice for these columns:
smallint, numeric(1), char(1), something else?
smallint, for
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 07:43:48PM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
Is there any way to get the DB and schema name into
error messages, particularly when the errors
are logged? I'd like to be able to distinguish
errors coming from the test databases from those
coming from the live databases.
To
Hello !
I use psql ODBC v.8.00.0101 with MS-Access 2002
under XP Pro.
If I use a System Data Source configured with
:
Datasource using :
-Bool AS Char,
- True is -1.
So Query with criteria "true" work
but checked fields don't work !?
If Datasource use :
- Bool NOT char,
- True is -1.
So
On 7/12/05, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a MySQL database that I'm converting to PostgreSQL which has 10 columns
with TINYINT type, i.e., a one-byte integer. Only one of them qualifies as a
true BOOLEAN. Two are entity identifiers (for limited range classes or
categories) and three
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 01:16:07AM -0400, Joe wrote:
I have a MySQL database that I'm converting to PostgreSQL which has 10
columns with TINYINT type, i.e., a one-byte integer. Only one of them
qualifies as a true BOOLEAN. Two are entity identifiers (for limited range
classes or
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 10:14 AM
David Esposito [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As promised, here are two runs of VACUUM VERBOSE on the
problem table ...
There was a lot of activity on the campaign_email table on
Our product will be storing its character data in utf-8
format (unicode encoding).
What is the best way to achive cultural sensitive sorting
using the utf-8 data?
Is it possible have the locale apply to a connection?
If so, is the cultural sorting support mature in
PostgreSQL?
What type
On 07/12/2005 09:15:20 AM, Michael Fuhr wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 07:43:48PM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
Is there any way to get the DB and schema name into
error messages, particularly when the errors
are logged?
To see how logging can be configured, refer to Error Reporting and
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 15:05:30 -0300,
David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Roman. Many thanks for your reply. This is interesting and will I
give this a try and let you know how it works out. With this you are
right, application logic and transaction don't have to be separate
which
Hi all,
I've dropped a schema in my database with this command
:
delete from pg_namespace where nspname = toto;
I know ... I 've done a big mistake :( . I will prefer
drop schema toto the next time.
Now I can't do a pg_dump because some objects of the
removed schema are still referenced in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our product will be storing its character data in utf-8 format (unicode
encoding).
What is the best way to achive cultural sensitive sorting using the
utf-8 data?
See below.
Is it possible have the locale apply to a connection?
A locale applies to a whole
It depends what language you want to sort. Lots of languages do not
have a sort alphabet. For example, Japanese. It can be quite
difficult to sort unusual languages like this. I am not aware of any
standard technique for sorting Japanese text other than keeping an
arbitrarily sorted
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-07-12 10:08:37 -0500:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 15:05:30 -0300,
David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Roman. Many thanks for your reply. This is interesting and will I
give this a try and let you know how it works out. With this you are
right, application
Hello
I run PostgreSQL 7.4.6 on Linux with a JDBC client.
I initialised my database cluster with the following initdb command:
initdb --locale=en_GB.UTF-8 --encoding UNICODE
I have now discovered that my database cannot distinguish Japanese names or
words - it throws unique constraint errors
How stable is the Windows version of PGSQL 8? Is it as stable as the Linux
version or should I be looking for something else?
Regards,
BTJ
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
David Esposito [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As promised, here are two runs of VACUUM VERBOSE on the problem table ...
BTW, the tail of the VACUUM VERBOSE output ought to have something about
overall usage of the FSM --- what does that look like?
regards, tom lane
Harry Mantheakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I run PostgreSQL 7.4.6 on Linux with a JDBC client.
I initialised my database cluster with the following initdb command:
initdb --locale=en_GB.UTF-8 --encoding UNICODE
I have now discovered that my database cannot distinguish Japanese names or
I need to convert hundreds of Oracle stored procs across several
developing databases. I'm focusing on scripting as much of this as
possible, and I'm currently stuck on converting PL/SQL's NO_DATA_FOUND
behavior. What approaches have other people used? I'm targeting
PostgreSQL 8.1.
The problem
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 11:29, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
How stable is the Windows version of PGSQL 8? Is it as stable as the Linux
version or should I be looking for something else?
For certain values of stable, yes, it is.
However, if for no other reason than the fact the the port is fairly
new,
Hello Ets!
I think that you should use Format,so
thatAccess can understands bools.
I have done it in this way:
In AccessQuery Builder use alias for field,
for example
AliasName:
Format([FieldName])
In Criteria use "True" or
"False" instead of -1
Tell me if it works for you. In my case it
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 18:29 +0200, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
Is it as stable as the Linux
version
From http://www.postgresql.org/docs/whatsnew:
Although tested throughout our release cycle, the Windows port does not
have the benefit of years of use in production environments that
PostgreSQL has
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 17:35:35 +0200,
Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-07-12 10:08:37 -0500:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 15:05:30 -0300,
David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Roman. Many thanks for your reply. This is interesting and will I
give
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 11:29, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
How stable is the Windows version of PGSQL 8? Is it as stable as the
Linux
version or should I be looking for something else?
For certain values of stable, yes, it is.
However, if for no other reason than the fact the the port is fairly
Hi Bruno and Roman. I am attempting to implement your advice. Bruno,
how do I make a foreign key deferable since this sounds like an
interesting approach.
I have got another problem on top of the first. For the first two
inserts I need to insert a multi-dimensional array into one of the
Hi
I am trying to get a better understanding of how transactions work in
pl/pgsql functions. I found the following text in the help:
It is important not to confuse the use of BEGIN/END for grouping statements
in PL/pgSQL with the database commands for transaction control. PL/pgSQL's
BEGIN/END are
On 7/12/05, Craig Bryden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I am trying to get a better understanding of how transactions work in
pl/pgsql functions. I found the following text in the help:
It is important not to confuse the use of BEGIN/END for grouping statements
in PL/pgSQL with the database
Performing an update to an inherited table system from inside of a stored
procedure (PLPGSQL) seems to be unusually sluggish... Does anyone have a
faster solution ? I am updating 50 records and it takes approximately 4.375
seconds + or -
The inherited table has an ON INSERT DO INSTEAD and
Craig Bryden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am trying to get a better understanding of how transactions work in
pl/pgsql functions. I found the following text in the help:
It is important not to confuse the use of BEGIN/END for grouping statements
in PL/pgSQL with the database commands for
I insalled Postgres 8 in Windows XP with default settings
I xreated database with encoding unicode.
I noticed that the sort order of accented characters is
B
Ü
Ö
C.
Ä
Õ
C
this is totally incorrect! It is interesting that names beginning with C
are not contiguous: between C. and C are accented
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 12:15, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 11:29, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
How stable is the Windows version of PGSQL 8? Is it as stable as the
Linux
version or should I be looking for something else?
For certain values of stable, yes, it is.
LOG: checkpoints are occurring too frequently (19 seconds apart)
HINT: Consider increasing the configuration parameter
checkpoint_segments.
LOG: checkpoints are occurring too frequently (12 seconds apart)
HINT: Consider increasing the configuration parameter
checkpoint_segments.
LOG:
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 13:04, Greg Patnude wrote:
LOG: checkpoints are occurring too frequently (19 seconds apart)
HINT: Consider increasing the configuration parameter
checkpoint_segments.
LOG: checkpoints are occurring too frequently (12 seconds apart)
HINT: Consider increasing the
It's very stable, I have been using it for a Apache DSO application
since the first beta (July/Aug 2004) and It just runs and runs and runs.
The app is not super busy, but I have never had a issue with the database.
I replaced a old MS SQL server 7 install with Postgresql win32 and never
looked
From AMD's suit against Intel. Perhaps relevant to some PG/AMD issues.
...125. Intel has designed its compiler purposely to degrade performance when
a program
is run on an AMD platform. To achieve this, Intel designed the compiler to
compile code
along several alternate code paths. Some paths
Scott Marlowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 13:04, Greg Patnude wrote:
LOG: checkpoints are occurring too frequently (19 seconds apart)
HINT: Consider increasing the configuration parameter
checkpoint_segments.
LOG: checkpoints are
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 20:45:37 +0300,
Andrus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How to force the correct sort order or at least move accented characters
ÕÄÖÜ to end of sorted list ?
Sort order depends on the locale used in initdb. If you want data sorted
by the codes used to represent the data,
Hmm, is that actually the correct spelling of the locale? On my Linux
box, locale -a says it's en_GB.utf8. I'm not sure how well initdb can
verify the validity of a locale parameter, especially back in the 7.4
branch. It could be that you are actually using a locale that doesn't
use UTF8
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 13:24, Mohan, Ross wrote:
From AMD's suit against Intel. Perhaps relevant to some PG/AMD issues.
...125. Intel has designed its compiler purposely to degrade performance
when a program
is run on an AMD platform. To achieve this, Intel designed the compiler to
OK. I have read that. The part that sticks out is A block containing an
EXCEPTION clause is significantly more expensive to enter and exit than a
block without one. Therefore, don't use EXCEPTION without need. .
Performance is paramount to me.
If I ommit the EXCEPTION clause will all the
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 13:29, Greg Patnude wrote:
Scott Marlowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 13:04, Greg Patnude wrote:
LOG: checkpoints are occurring too frequently (19 seconds apart)
HINT: Consider increasing the configuration
What if the select calling my function is not in it's own explicit
transaction block?
Thanks
Craig
- Original Message -
From: Jaime Casanova [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Craig Bryden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 7:37 PM
Subject: Re:
Harry Mantheakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Meanwhile, am I correct in assuming that re-initialising my database cluster
with --locale=C will solve the problem?
AFAIK it should --- of course you won't get any very intelligent sorting
or case folding, but at least it can tell the difference
I am trying to get a better understanding of how transactions work in
pl/pgsql functions. I found the following text in the help:
It is important not to confuse the use of BEGIN/END for grouping statements
in PL/pgSQL with the database commands for transaction control. PL/pgSQL's
BEGIN/END
Craig Bryden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK. I have read that. The part that sticks out is A block containing an
EXCEPTION clause is significantly more expensive to enter and exit than a
block without one. Therefore, don't use EXCEPTION without need. .
Performance is paramount to me.
If I
David Esposito [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW, the tail of the VACUUM VERBOSE output ought to have
something about
overall usage of the FSM --- what does that look like?
INFO: free space map: 528 relations, 172357 pages stored; 170096 total
pages needed
DETAIL: Allocated FSM size: 1
Thanks a stack. That has answered by question.
Craig
- Original Message -
From: Douglas McNaught [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Craig Bryden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pgsql pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Transaction Handling in pl/pgsql
Looks like gborg is having issues again. The slony home page isn't
showing up.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Sort order depends on the locale used in initdb. If you want data sorted
by the codes used to represent the data, then you might want to initdb
with a locale of C. Doing an initdb will require a dump and reload.
Bruno, thank you.
SHOW ALL command returns the following:
As promised, here are two runs of VACUUM VERBOSE on the problem table ...
There was a lot of activity on the campaign_email table on Friday
(Saturday's VACUUM) as compared with Monday (Tuesday's VACUUM)
Thanks,
Dave
VACUUM VERBOSE from 1:30am Saturday July 9
INFO: vacuuming xxx.campaign_email
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-07-12 12:11:45 -0500:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 17:35:35 +0200,
Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-07-12 10:08:37 -0500:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 15:05:30 -0300,
David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking the only
LOG: checkpoints are occurring too frequently (19 seconds apart)
HINT: Consider increasing the configuration parameter
checkpoint_segments.
LOG: checkpoints are occurring too frequently (12 seconds apart)
HINT: Consider increasing the configuration parameter
checkpoint_segments.
LOG:
How stable is the windows version of pgsql 8? Is it as stable as the Linux
version or
should I look elsewehere after a good sql srv for Windows?
Regards.
BTJ
--
---
Bjørn T Johansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Most odd ... just restarted it, taking a look to see if there is a reason
why the web server is stopping :(
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Scott Marlowe wrote:
Looks like gborg is having issues again. The slony home page isn't
showing up.
---(end of
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 01:41:14PM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 13:24, Mohan, Ross wrote:
From AMD's suit against Intel. Perhaps relevant to some PG/AMD issues.
Well, this is, right now, just AMD's supposition about Intel's
behaviour, I'm not sure one way or the other if
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 22:09:40 +0300,
Andrus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sort order depends on the locale used in initdb. If you want data sorted
by the codes used to represent the data, then you might want to initdb
with a locale of C. Doing an initdb will require a dump and reload.
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 15:06, Mark Rae wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 01:41:14PM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 13:24, Mohan, Ross wrote:
From AMD's suit against Intel. Perhaps relevant to some PG/AMD issues.
Well, this is, right now, just AMD's supposition about Intel's
Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
How stable is the windows version of pgsql 8? Is it as stable as the Linux
version or
should I look elsewehere after a good sql srv for Windows?
This is a tough question to answer and you will probably get a wide
range or responses. Many people on these lists
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 03:11:35PM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 15:06, Mark Rae wrote:
I think its more a case of AMD now having solid evidence to back
up the claims.
Wow! That's pretty fascinating. So, is the evidence pretty
overwhelming that this was not simple
I've email'd Chris about this, since I'm getting some really odd
behvaiours when hitting the web site ... namely, its trying to load an
index_right.php file from venus.hub.org, but I can't find any references
to index_right.php in the code (the file is there, but nothing seems to
reference
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andrus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SHOW ALL command returns the following:
client_encoding;UNICODE
lc_collate;Estonian_Estonia.1257
lc_ctype;Estonian_Estonia.1257
lc_messages;Estonian_Estonia.1257
lc_monetary;Estonian_Estonia.1257
index_right.php fixed now also ...
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I've email'd Chris about this, since I'm getting some really odd behvaiours
when hitting the web site ... namely, its trying to load an index_right.php
file from venus.hub.org, but I can't find any references
-Original Message-
From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 11:40 AM
To: Greg Patnude
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Checkpoints are occurring too frequently...
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 13:29, Greg Patnude wrote:
Scott Marlowe
Hello
i would like to export my PostGreSQL database and import it on another
pc. i seem not to find this possibility in 'pgAdmin III', can someone
help me on how to do this?
greetZ
wes
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our
Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
smallint takes two bytes. Numeric(1) will take around 10 bytes and char(1) will
take 5 bytes (4 bytes for length of data).
I never would've imagined *that* amount of overhead for CHAR(1)! I would've
imagined that it would take up one byte (or two with a NULL
[I'm not subscribed to this list, and i'm sending this because the man
that develop our internal application is away... so i'm not aware of
most of the detail, i'm only seeking to some quick fix, wait tomorrow
for some better and deeper info.]
[[so, please, keep me in CC]]
In our organization we
Greg Patnude [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, how often is this running? Once a second, once a minute, once and
hour? If it's only running once an hour, then something else is wrong.
I've been running it about 2 or 3 times a minute on average... I
Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I never would've imagined *that* amount of overhead for CHAR(1)! I
would've imagined that it would take up one byte (or two with a NULL
indicator). After all, we're not talking about VARCHAR(1) [which is
sort of useless]. Don't the catalogs know the declared
Meanwhile, am I correct in assuming that re-initialising my database cluster
with --locale=C will solve the problem?
AFAIK it should --- of course you won't get any very intelligent sorting
or case folding, but at least it can tell the difference between
different characters ;-). Be sure
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 15:55, Greg Patnude wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 11:40 AM
To: Greg Patnude
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Checkpoints are occurring too frequently...
On Tue,
Hi,
in postgresql you have several possibilites to get the rank of items. A thread
earlier this year shows correlated subqueries (not very performant) and other
tricks and techniques to solve the ranking problem:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-05/msg00157.php
The
What is the query that is slow?
What is the schema for the tables involved in the slow query?
What do you see when you do an EXPLAIN ANALYZE on the query?
Is the machine and disk subsystem identical?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:pgsql-general-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The factory default has never been 1; AFAIR it's always been 3,
and like many of the other defaults that's aimed for small-and-slow
machines. If you're not short of disk space, something like 30
is reasonable. (Note this can cost you 32MB per increment, so a
setting of 30 means you're willing
Tom Lane wrote:
Because the length specification is in *characters*, which is not by any
means the same as *bytes*.
We could possibly put enough intelligence into the low-level tuple
manipulation routines to count characters in whatever encoding we happen
to be using, but it's a lot faster and
It's been suggested in the past that we ought to document multiple sets
of parameter choices from small test platform to big fast machine;
MySQL have done something of the sort for a long time.
That is probably a good idea.
regards, tom lane
--
Your PostgreSQL
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The factory default has never been 1; AFAIR it's always been 3,
and like many of the other defaults that's aimed for small-and-slow
machines. If you're not short of disk space, something like 30
is reasonable. (Note this can cost you 32MB per
Marco Gaiarin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The application work well, apart some query that took some *MINUTES* to
complete, when on 7.2 take (half of) second(s).
Could we see EXPLAIN ANALYZE results for the problem query on both
versions?
regards, tom lane
Janning Vygen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a guess, what happens here: The order of the subselect statement is
dropped by the optimizer because the optimizer doesn't see the side-effect
of the ranking function.
That guess is wrong.
I think the problem is that you are trying to update
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 05:37:32PM -0400, Joe wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Because the length specification is in *characters*, which is not by any
means the same as *bytes*.
We could possibly put enough intelligence into the low-level tuple
manipulation routines to count characters in whatever
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 05:37:32PM -0400, Joe wrote:
If it stored character data in Unicode (UCS-16) it would always take
up two-bytes per character.
Really? We don't support UCS-16, for good reasons (we'd have to rewrite
several parts of the code in order to support
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't see how UCS-16 could always use only 2 bytes.
Simple: it fails to handle Unicode code points above 0x1. (We only
recently fixed a similar limitation in our UTF8 support, by the by, but
it *is* fixed and I doubt we want to backpedal.)
The
When I was trying to connect my databse with jdbc, I
got the following error message:
org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: Connection
rejected: FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry for host
mydomain, user , database myDB, SSL off.
When I run in dos console psql myDB... it works
fine.
My jdbc code is
Until now I have been content to have the superuser CREATE FUNCTION...LANGUAGE
'C'
because I noticed that ordinary users could not:
ERROR: permission denied for language c
I would like to allow a user to create C language functions, but can't
find just which privilege I need to grant. The
Tony Smith wrote:
When I was trying to connect my databse with jdbc, I
got the following error message:
org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: Connection
rejected: FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry for host
mydomain, user , database myDB, SSL off.
You need to setup your pg_hba.conf to allow remote
TJ O'Donnell wrote:
Until now I have been content to have the superuser CREATE FUNCTION...LANGUAGE
'C'
because I noticed that ordinary users could not:
ERROR: permission denied for language c
I would like to allow a user to create C language functions, but can't
find just which privilege I
On Jul 12, 2005, at 1:15 PM, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
BTW, is PGSQL 8 supported on Windows NT 4?
It may work, but is not supported:
1.2) I heard that NT4 is supported. Is that true?
Although not officially supported, PostgreSQL will run on Windows NT4
with a few minor issues including:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:52:50PM +0200, mail TechEvolution wrote:
i would like to export my PostGreSQL database and import it on another
pc. i seem not to find this possibility in 'pgAdmin III', can someone
help me on how to do this?
See the documentation regarding backup and restore.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 03:43:43PM -0700, TJ O'Donnell wrote:
Until now I have been content to have the superuser CREATE
FUNCTION...LANGUAGE 'C'
because I noticed that ordinary users could not:
ERROR: permission denied for language c
I would like to allow a user to create C language
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:52:24AM -0700, Greg Patnude wrote:
Performing an update to an inherited table system from inside of a stored
procedure (PLPGSQL) seems to be unusually sluggish...
Is the update slower when done inside a function than when doing
it directly (e.g., from psql)? That
Hello
I run PostgreSQL 7.4.6 on Linux with a JDBC client.
I initialised my database cluster with the following initdb command:
initdb --locale=en_GB.UTF-8 --encoding UNICODE
I have now discovered that my database cannot distinguish Japanese names or
words - it throws unique
It depends what language you want to sort. Lots of languages do not
have a sort alphabet. For example, Japanese. It can be quite
difficult to sort unusual languages like this. I am not aware of any
standard technique for sorting Japanese text other than keeping an
arbitrarily sorted
Enrico Riedel wrote:
Has anyone an idea on how or any pointer into the right direction to
accomplish the above task?
Thanks already in advance!
If you don't mind having plpythonu installed in your database, a lot of this
sort of thing becomes trivial:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION sha1(text)
I 'm storing things in a table with now() and I want to select * from
theTable WHERE the Timestamp is the current time - 20 minutes
Anyone know the correct syntax. I was trying something like:
WHERE timestamp_field (timestamp now() - interval '20 minutes')
and will continue reading the
Matthew Terenzio wrote:
I 'm storing things in a table with now() and I want to select * from
theTable WHERE the Timestamp is the current time - 20 minutes
Anyone know the correct syntax. I was trying something like:
WHERE timestamp_field (timestamp now() - interval '20 minutes')
On Jul 12, 2005, at 11:43 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Matthew Terenzio wrote:
I 'm storing things in a table with now() and I want to select * from
theTable WHERE the Timestamp is the current time - 20 minutes
Anyone know the correct syntax. I was trying something like:
WHERE timestamp_field
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Certainly the idea of not having to store a length word for CHAR(1) fields
is not going to inspire anyone to invest the effort involved ;-)
That's a pretty big motivation though. Storage space efficiency is a huge
factor in raw sequential scan speed.
Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Personally I would settle for a fuller set of small fixed size datatypes. The
char datatype is pretty much exactly what's needed except that it provides
such a quirky interface.
I'm not actually against inventing an int1/tinyint type. I used to be
worried
pgsql-general:
How to use rollback in function with 'pgsql'?
Nee.Mem
2005-07-13
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
