Re: [GENERAL] RPM compat-postgresql-libs-4-2 for IA-64

2007-02-20 Thread DANTE Alexandra
Hello Devrim, hello List, No problem to share with you the RPM. Yesterday afternoon, I built the 8.2.3 RPM for RHEL4-AS and IA-64. I propose to work off-list with you Devrim, so you could take the RPM and check them. Is it OK ? Regards, Alexandra Devrim GUNDUZ wrote: Hello, On Mon,

Re: [GENERAL] RPM compat-postgresql-libs-4-2 for IA-64

2007-02-20 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
Hi, On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 09:14 +0100, DANTE Alexandra wrote: I propose to work off-list with you Devrim, so you could take the RPM and check them. Is it OK ? Ok for me :) Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services,

Re: [GENERAL] How to force disconnections from a Perl script?

2007-02-20 Thread Csaba Nagy
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 03:43, Tom Lane wrote: Nonsense. pg_stat_activity + kill -TERM should solve this problem reasonably well. Some of us don't trust kill -TERM 100%, which is why it's not currently exposed as a standard function, but if you're using a reasonably recent PG release it's

[GENERAL] Having performance problems with TSearch2

2007-02-20 Thread Rafa Comino
I have problems with queries over tsearch index. I have a table of books, with 120 registers. I have created an GIST index over the title and subtitle, CREATE INDEX idxts2_titsub_idx ON public.libros USING gist (idxts2_titsub); My problems started when i execute my queries. For example, i

Re: [GENERAL] Having performance problems with TSearch2

2007-02-20 Thread Teodor Sigaev
Use GIN index instead of GiST I have a table of books, with 120 registers. I have created an GIST index over the title and subtitle, -- Teodor Sigaev E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

[GENERAL] Having performance problems with TSearch2

2007-02-20 Thread Rafa Comino
I have problems with queries over tsearch index. I have a table of books, with 120 registers. I have created an GIST index over the title and subtitle, CREATE INDEX idxts2_titsub_idx ON public.libros USING gist (idxts2_titsub); My problems started when i execute my queries. For example, i

Re: [GENERAL] Advisory on possibly insecure security definer functions

2007-02-20 Thread Tomasz Ostrowski
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Peter Eisentraut wrote: By installing functions or operators with appropriate signatures in other schemas, users can then redirect any function or operator call in the function code to implementations of their choice [snip] The proper fix for this problem is to insert

Re: [GENERAL] boolean operator on interval producing strange results

2007-02-20 Thread Merlin Moncure
On 2/19/07, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: # select ((now() - '1 day'::interval)::timestamp - now()) 0; ?column? -- f -- looks busted to me (1 row) If you'd casted to timestamptz then I'd agree this is busted. As-is, it might have

Re: [GENERAL] boolean operator on interval producing strange results

2007-02-20 Thread Adam Rich
All of these statements produce 'f' for me as well, via 8.2.1 on RHEL 4. select ((now() - '1 day'::interval)::timestamp - now()) 0; select ((now() - '1 day'::interval)::timestamptz - now()) 0; select ('-1 days'::interval) 0; But all of these return 't': select ((now() - '1

Re: [GENERAL] boolean operator on interval producing strange results

2007-02-20 Thread Tom Lane
Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 2/19/07, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: # select ((now() - '1 day'::interval)::timestamp - now()) 0; ?column? -- f -- looks busted to me (1 row) If you'd casted to timestamptz then I'd

Re: [GENERAL] Password issue revisited

2007-02-20 Thread Bruce Momjian
Added to TODO for Win32: o Check .pgpass file permissions --- Shane Ambler wrote: Michael Schmidt wrote: Fellow PostgreSQL fans, 1. I don't see that this would pose a major security risk. In fact, in

Re: [GENERAL] indexes across multiple tables

2007-02-20 Thread Ian Harding
On 2/18/07, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Toby Tremayne wrote: Hi all, I'm just experimenting with tsearch2 - I have it all working fine but I was wondering if there's a way to create indexes containing vector columns from multiple tables? Or if not, how do people usually manage this

[GENERAL] Warning TupleDesc reference leak

2007-02-20 Thread Marek Lewczuk
Hello, after upgrade to 8.2 version, PostgreSQL throws following warnings: WARNING: TupleDesc reference leak: TupleDesc 0x42051d90 (16425,-1) still referenced WARNING: TupleDesc reference leak: TupleDesc 0x41f60ad0 (16425,-1) still referenced WARNING: TupleDesc reference leak: TupleDesc

Re: [GENERAL] Password issue revisited

2007-02-20 Thread Magnus Hagander
Are we sure we want to do this? (Sorry, didn't notice this thread last time) The default on *all* windows versions since NT 4.0 (which is when the directory we use was added) will put this file in a protected directory. The only case when it's not protected by default is if you're usnig FAT

Re: [GENERAL] How would you handle updating an item and related stuff all at once?

2007-02-20 Thread Ian Harding
On 2/17/07, Rick Schumeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This may be bad design on my part, but... Not at all. Very common scenario I have three tables of interest...Account, Employee, and AccountEmployeeRelation. There is a many-to-many relationship between accounts and employees. The join

Re: [GENERAL] Database performance comparison paper.

2007-02-20 Thread Guido Neitzer
Am 19.02.2007 um 17:49 schrieb Jan Wieck: Oh, this one wasn't about raw speed of trivial single table statements like all the others? No, it wasn't. They also tested the insert performance of a system without foreign keys and without transactions (MySQL MyISAM) against systems with

Re: [GENERAL] Password issue revisited

2007-02-20 Thread Bruce Momjian
Magnus Hagander wrote: Are we sure we want to do this? (Sorry, didn't notice this thread last time) The default on *all* windows versions since NT 4.0 (which is when the directory we use was added) will put this file in a protected directory. The only case when it's not protected by default

Re: [GENERAL] Warning TupleDesc reference leak

2007-02-20 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 08:55, Marek Lewczuk wrote: Hello, after upgrade to 8.2 version, PostgreSQL throws following warnings: WARNING: TupleDesc reference leak: TupleDesc 0x42051d90 (16425,-1) still referenced I don't know what that means, but which 8.2 version? 8.2.3 is the latest 8.2

Re: [GENERAL] Write errors in postgres log

2007-02-20 Thread CAJ CAJ
Hello Tom, Thanks for the response. My replies inline... On 2/18/07, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CAJ CAJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We have 2 servers running postgres database 8.0.3 serving a web application. You do realize we are up to 8.0.12 in that branch? You're missing nearly two

Re: [GENERAL] boolean operator on interval producing strange results

2007-02-20 Thread Merlin Moncure
On 2/20/07, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 2/19/07, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: # select ((now() - '1 day'::interval)::timestamp - now()) 0; ?column? -- f -- looks busted to me (1 row)

Re: [GENERAL] Have anyone this man e-mail ?

2007-02-20 Thread Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha
No I didn't. I just need an expert in Slony-I My application needs critically an slony-I master to run correctly. In my incursions Slony-I appears quite difficult. I need someone to make a configuration step-by-step (in msn messenger) configuration. The documentation of Robert does not work

Re: [GENERAL] Warning TupleDesc reference leak

2007-02-20 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Marek Lewczuk wrote: Hello, after upgrade to 8.2 version, PostgreSQL throws following warnings: WARNING: TupleDesc reference leak: TupleDesc 0x42051d90 (16425,-1) still referenced Are there C functions, or anything interesting which we should know about your database? -- Alvaro Herrera

Re: [GENERAL] Warning TupleDesc reference leak

2007-02-20 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Marek Lewczuk wrote: Hello, after upgrade to 8.2 version, PostgreSQL throws following warnings: WARNING: TupleDesc reference leak: TupleDesc 0x42051d90 (16425,-1) still referenced WARNING: TupleDesc reference leak: TupleDesc 0x41f60ad0 (16425,-1) still referenced WARNING: TupleDesc

Re: [GENERAL] open source - content management system - that uses PostGreSQL

2007-02-20 Thread Frank Miles
One nice CMS package -- it doesn't force you to use Postgresql, but that is (IIRC) the default -- and python: http://www.djangoproject.com/ HTH-- -frank ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

[GENERAL] Complex search advice?

2007-02-20 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
I want to be able to build complex search and reporting capabilities in to our PHP5 application. We want to be able to save searches for later use. We also want to build queries from virtually any field in certain tables from our PHP app. I hope to do as much within postgresql as possible. Then I

Re: [GENERAL] Complex search advice?

2007-02-20 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 11:26, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: I want to be able to build complex search and reporting capabilities in to our PHP5 application. We want to be able to save searches for later use. We also want to build queries from virtually any field in certain tables from our PHP app.

Re: [GENERAL] Password issue revisited

2007-02-20 Thread Shane Ambler
Bruce Momjian wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: Are we sure we want to do this? (Sorry, didn't notice this thread last time) The default on *all* windows versions since NT 4.0 (which is when the directory we use was added) will put this file in a protected directory. The only case when it's not

Re: [GENERAL] Password issue revisited

2007-02-20 Thread Magnus Hagander
The default on *all* windows versions since NT 4.0 (which is when the directory we use was added) will put this file in a protected directory. The only case when it's not protected by default is if you're usnig FAT filesystem, in which case there is nothing you can do about it anyway. On

Re: [GENERAL] Password issue revisited

2007-02-20 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Michael Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ... Regarding how I concluded that PGPASSFILE was deprecated for pg_dump, I offer the following. 1. The documentation for pg_dump in the manual (Section VI) includes a section labeled Environment. This lists PGDATABASE,

Re: [GENERAL] Password issue revisited

2007-02-20 Thread Tony Caduto
Magnus Hagander wrote: Are we sure we want to do this? (Sorry, didn't notice this thread last time) The default on *all* windows versions since NT 4.0 (which is when the directory we use was added) will put this file in a protected directory. Is there truly such a thing on a windows PC? All

Re: [GENERAL] Password issue revisited

2007-02-20 Thread Magnus Hagander
Tony Caduto wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: Are we sure we want to do this? (Sorry, didn't notice this thread last time) The default on *all* windows versions since NT 4.0 (which is when the directory we use was added) will put this file in a protected directory. Is there truly such a

Re: [GENERAL] Password issue revisited

2007-02-20 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tony Caduto wrote: What about having a wallet type system where the user can create a pass phrase to protect a generated key that would get loaded once per session. That is how KDE allows users to store passwords. If we wanted to do that, we could

Re: [GENERAL] Password issue revisited

2007-02-20 Thread Magnus Hagander
Tom Lane wrote: Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tony Caduto wrote: What about having a wallet type system where the user can create a pass phrase to protect a generated key that would get loaded once per session. That is how KDE allows users to store passwords. If we wanted to

Re: [GENERAL] Password issue revisited

2007-02-20 Thread Dave Page
Magnus Hagander wrote: Just to make things clear, this wouldn't be about another auth method. Windows has an API to store arbitrary passwords in a secure way. At least it does in XP+, not sure if it was in 2000. Would it really solve Tony's problem though? I'm not familiar with the API you're

[GENERAL] Views: having a rule call a function vs. using a before trigger

2007-02-20 Thread Karl O. Pinc
Hi, Postgresql 8.1. I'm trying to come up with a generic way of inserting into a view, particularly regards error testing and the generation of complicated foreign keys. I don't seem to be having much luck. (I also want to update and delete, but haven't gotten that far.) I thought that, for

Re: [GENERAL] Password issue revisited

2007-02-20 Thread Magnus Hagander
Dave Page wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: Just to make things clear, this wouldn't be about another auth method. Windows has an API to store arbitrary passwords in a secure way. At least it does in XP+, not sure if it was in 2000. Would it really solve Tony's problem though? I'm not

Re: [GENERAL] Password issue revisited

2007-02-20 Thread Dave Page
Magnus Hagander wrote: Dave Page wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: Just to make things clear, this wouldn't be about another auth method. Windows has an API to store arbitrary passwords in a secure way. At least it does in XP+, not sure if it was in 2000. Would it really solve Tony's problem

Re: [GENERAL] Syncing postgres data with Pocket PC

2007-02-20 Thread Andrej Ricnik-Bay
On 2/20/07, Justin Dearing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I need a way to sync a postgres view with a table on a Windows CE device. The table will be read only on the mobile device. I am seeking to replace an access database that syncs a table with a pocket pc table via active sync. I would

Re: [GENERAL] encode, lower and 0x8a

2007-02-20 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have updated the encode() documentation to not mention ASCII, and to be more specific about what 'escape' does. Backpatched to 8.2.X. --- Michael Fuhr wrote: On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 02:28:38PM -0500, Michael Artz wrote:

Re: [GENERAL] Database performance comparison paper.

2007-02-20 Thread Andrej Ricnik-Bay
On 2/21/07, Guido Neitzer wrote: It would be more or less the same, if you compare copy against insert performance on PostgreSQL and state that insert should be as fast as copy without saying why. Btw: these guys claim to be database consultants. Guess one should consider oneself lucky not to

[GENERAL] invalid input syntax for integer: NULL

2007-02-20 Thread Yonatan Ben-Nes
Hi everyone, I'm trying to write a PL/pgSQL function which execute an insert, I encounter a problem when I try to insert NULL value into an integer field. The following code is for reproducing: CREATE TABLE test( bh INT8 ); CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION testinsertion(intornull bigint) RETURNS

Re: [GENERAL] Installing support for python on windows

2007-02-20 Thread Rhys Stewart
resurrection Ok so i am having trouble installing plpython, and found this thread. Howevre, after adding postgresql/bin to the path and the python lib directory to the path i still get: createlang: language installation failed: ERROR: could not load library C:/Pro gram

Re: [GENERAL] invalid input syntax for integer: NULL

2007-02-20 Thread Karl O. Pinc
On 02/20/2007 03:45:55 PM, Yonatan Ben-Nes wrote: Hi everyone, I'm trying to write a PL/pgSQL function which execute an insert, I encounter a problem when I try to insert NULL value into an integer field. RETURN 'INSERT INTO test (bh) VALUES ('||COALESCE(intornull, 'NULL')||')'; And

Re: [GENERAL] Priorities for users or queries?

2007-02-20 Thread Ron Mayer
Bruce Momjian wrote: Hard to argue with that. Is it a strong enough argument to add a TODO? I'm thinking some sort of TODO might be called for. Perhaps two TODOs? * Use the OS's priority features to prioritize backends (and document that it might work better with OS's that support

Re: [GENERAL] invalid input syntax for integer: NULL

2007-02-20 Thread Stephan Szabo
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Yonatan Ben-Nes wrote: Hi everyone, I'm trying to write a PL/pgSQL function which execute an insert, I encounter a problem when I try to insert NULL value into an integer field. The following code is for reproducing: CREATE TABLE test( bh INT8 ); CREATE OR REPLACE

[GENERAL] can't stop the postmaster?

2007-02-20 Thread Tomi N/A
This is probably a question more appropriate on a gentoo mailing list, but I'll ask anyway as it obviously has to do with postgresql and I've a feeling someone will probably know: can anyone explain what is it that happens here when I try to stop the postmaster? What can I do about it? #

[GENERAL] Crosstab

2007-02-20 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
I am trying to use the crosstab function of the contrib tablefunc. Reading the README, I believe I am supposed to be using crosstab(sql, N) for my situation and wondering if the SQL can be based on a view? I have this view created that gives me each sales rep and their total number of units sold

Re: [GENERAL] can't stop the postmaster?

2007-02-20 Thread Andrej Ricnik-Bay
On 2/21/07, Tomi N/A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # /etc/init.d/postgresql stop * Stopping PostgreSQL ... start-stop-daemon --stop --pidfile /var/lib/postgresql/data/postmaster.pid --retry -TERM//-INT//-QUIT --oknodo /sbin/start-stop-daemon: invalid schedule item (must be [-]signal-name,

[GENERAL] REVOKE ALL

2007-02-20 Thread David Legault
Hello, Is there a way to revoke all privileges of a role without actually specifying the whole list of items. Like if a role has privileges on FUNCTIONs, is there a REVOKE all FUNCTIONS. Is there a way to check if it has a GRANT in a particular type (CONNECT, FUNCTION, TRIGGER) before calling

Re: [GENERAL] Database performance comparison paper.

2007-02-20 Thread Jan Wieck
On 2/20/2007 3:51 PM, Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote: On 2/21/07, Guido Neitzer wrote: It would be more or less the same, if you compare copy against insert performance on PostgreSQL and state that insert should be as fast as copy without saying why. Btw: these guys claim to be database consultants.

[GENERAL] postgresql vs mysql

2007-02-20 Thread gustavo halperin
Hello I have a friend that ask me why postgresql is better than mysql. I personally prefer posgresql, but she need to give in her work 3 or 4 strong reasons for that. I mean not to much technical reasons. Can you give help me please ? Thank you, Gustavo --

Re: [GENERAL] Out of memory on vacuum analyze

2007-02-20 Thread Jim Nasby
On Feb 19, 2007, at 1:19 PM, Jeff Davis wrote: You told PostgreSQL that you have 900MB available for maintenance_work_mem, but your OS is denying the request. Try *lowering* that setting to something that your OS will allow. That seems like an awfully high setting to me. 900MB isn't that

[GENERAL] Error upgrading on W2K

2007-02-20 Thread Paul Lambert
I have postgres running on W2K, version 8.2.1 which I am upgrading to 8.2.3 but when I run the upgrade I get an error as follows: The installer has encountered an unexpected error installing this package. This may indicate a problem with this package. The error code is 2803. The install seemed

[GENERAL] number of tables limited over time (not simultaneous)?

2007-02-20 Thread dave crane
We've settled upon a method for gathering raw statistics from widely scattered data centers of creating one sequence per-event, per minute. Each process (some lapp, some shell, some python, some perl etc) can call a shell script which calls ssh-psql to execute a nextval('event') sequence.

Re: [GENERAL] postgresql vs mysql

2007-02-20 Thread Jaime Casanova
On 2/20/07, gustavo halperin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello I have a friend that ask me why postgresql is better than mysql. I personally prefer posgresql, but she need to give in her work 3 or 4 strong reasons for that. I mean not to much technical reasons. Can you give help me please ?

[GENERAL] Nice article on Unicode and it's encodings (utf8, utf16 and utf32)

2007-02-20 Thread Tony Caduto
http://developersoven.blogspot.com/ -- Tony Caduto AM Software Design Home of Lightning Admin for PostgreSQL and MySQL http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [GENERAL] postgresql vs mysql

2007-02-20 Thread Tony Caduto
one last thing mysql team doesn't afraid to change behaviours between minor releases, look at this thread That is so true, all the differences between minor versions made creating Lightning Admin for MySQL a pain in the rear... After I did the port I really appreciated how clean PostgreSQL

Re: [GENERAL] Have anyone this man e-mail ?

2007-02-20 Thread Tom Lane
Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I just need an expert in Slony-I This is the wrong forum for discussing Slony ... you will be much more likely to find experts in the Slony lists: http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general regards,

Re: [GENERAL] postgresql vs mysql

2007-02-20 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/20/07 15:25, gustavo halperin wrote: Hello I have a friend that ask me why postgresql is better than mysql. I personally prefer posgresql, but she need to give in her work 3 or 4 strong reasons for that. I mean not to much technical

Re: [GENERAL] postgresql vs mysql

2007-02-20 Thread Adam Rich
I'm not apologizing for their past mistakes.. But the issue you cite is no longer true: As of 5.0.2, the server requires that month and day values be legal, and not merely in the range 1 to 12 and 1 to 31, respectively. mysql use test Database changed mysql create table test ( td DATE );

Re: [GENERAL] postgresql vs mysql

2007-02-20 Thread Tom Lane
Adam Rich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm not apologizing for their past mistakes.. But the issue you cite is no longer true: As of 5.0.2, the server requires that month and day values be legal, and not merely in the range 1 to 12 and 1 to 31, respectively. Really? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$

Re: [GENERAL] postgresql vs mysql

2007-02-20 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/20/07 23:59, Adam Rich wrote: I'm not apologizing for their past mistakes.. But the issue you cite is no longer true: As of 5.0.2, the server requires that month and day values be legal, and not merely in the range 1 to 12 and 1 to 31,

Re: [GENERAL] Out of memory on vacuum analyze

2007-02-20 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Jim Nasby wrote: On Feb 19, 2007, at 1:19 PM, Jeff Davis wrote: You told PostgreSQL that you have 900MB available for maintenance_work_mem, but your OS is denying the request. Try *lowering* that setting to something that your OS will allow. That seems like an awfully high setting to me.