Hi All ,
I have successfully installed pgcluster 1.7 rc7 and it is working fine
. But i have got a doubt on " Single Point Failure " .
I need a suggest from u all on this .
For an Application which demands High Availability and no Single Point
Failure and built Multi-Master Replication
Hi,
I'm sorry this mail is not very in topic, but I hope you can help me.
I'm trying to learn how postgis and mapserver work together, but I
cannot understand nearly anything. I mean, I read the documentation of
postgis and I think I understood it, but I cannot do anything useful
with it.
What
Jayaprakash, Sowmiya Lakshmi (STSD) wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the process of building Postgres 7.4.2 on a HP-UX PA Machine.
Why are you trying 7.4.2 and not 7.4.17? Or even 8.2.4, really.
--
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company -
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 12:44:49PM +0200, Ottavio Campana wrote:
I'm sorry this mail is not very in topic, but I hope you can help me.
Just so you know, perhaps a better list to contact with this is the
MapServer mailing list at
http://lists.umn.edu/archives/mapserver-users.html, or maybe the
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 07:00:32PM -0500, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
Exactly what I was looking for. Looks like I need to make moves to get
from 8.1 onto 8.2 ;-)
in any pg you should simply use select currval('sequence_name'); and be
happy with it.
depesz
--
quicksil1er: postgres is
Hello list,
Taking this discussion as a base:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2007-04/msg01034.php
Manuel helped me to develop an audit-trail engine, and even though it works
ok, I need to know better its inner workings:
From what I understand, the flow is something like this:
--- Marcelo de Moraes Serpa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello list,
[snip]
* Each http request gets an instance of a session_id
? Or is it
per-connection ?
It depends. There is no necessary correlation between
a session as defined within a web application and a
session as defined in the
Am 2007-08-17 12:53:41, schrieb Michael Glaesemann:
On Aug 17, 2007, at 7:27 , Michelle Konzack wrote:
*
* Do not Cc: me, because I am on THIS list, if I write here.*
You might want to consider changing your
On 8/18/07, Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 2007-08-17 12:53:41, schrieb Michael Glaesemann:
(Is is just me or have there been a lot of queries that can be solved
using DISTINCT ON recently?)
I do not know... Since when does DISTINCT ON exist?
I have been lurking on this
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2007-08-17 12:53:41, schrieb Michael Glaesemann:
On Aug 17, 2007, at 7:27 , Michelle Konzack wrote:
*
* Do not Cc: me, because I am on THIS list, if I write here.*
You might
Rishi Daryanani wrote:
I'm having problems with a query that's just
stalling my database. If someone could help me out -
I posted a forum topic on
http://forums.devshed.com/postgresql-help-21/postgresql-new-index-pros-and-cons-467120.html
Did you get any advice from that forum? Was it
Hi,
I was just wondering if anyone could help me out by taking a look to see
if I missed any important features.
http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com/pg_vs_fb
This comparison is going to be for the benefit of Delphi users. The
Delphi community is heavily biased to Firebird.
Please post any
Rishi,
I looked up that thread
1st:) p.s. I am using PostgreSQL 7.4.17
Any reason for that? Actual version is 8.2.4; or at least 8.1.9
2nd) your query is:
SELECT DISTINCT c.*
FROM customer c
LEFT OUTER JOIN weborders w
ON c.username =
Hi - I have the following array field:
SELECT pb_ids FROM pb WHERE id = 123:
pb_id
---
{196,213,215,229,409}
These numbers map to a productid in tblproducts so I figured I could
do this:
SELECT *
FROM tblproducts
WHERE productid = ANY (
SELECT pb_ids
Hello
2007/8/21, Josh Trutwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi - I have the following array field:
SELECT pb_ids FROM pb WHERE id = 123:
pb_id
---
{196,213,215,229,409}
These numbers map to a productid in tblproducts so I figured I could
do this:
SELECT *
FROM
Hi,
I want to save history for a few tables using triggers on update and
creation. What's the best approach to do this in a webapp environment
where I want to save which webapp user that is doing the change, not
the postgresql user?
--
regards,
Robin
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:15:59 +0200
Pavel Stehule [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SELECT * FROM ... WHERE 1000 IN (SELECT pb_ids FROM pb WHERE id=123)
or
SELECT * FROM ... WHERE 1000 = ANY(ARRAY(SELECT pb_ids FROM pb
WHERE id=123))
Thanks - another way:
SELECT * FROM ... WHERE 1000 =
am Tue, dem 21.08.2007, um 20:20:38 +0200 mailte Robin Helgelin folgendes:
Hi,
I want to save history for a few tables using triggers on update and
creation. What's the best approach to do this in a webapp environment
where I want to save which webapp user that is doing the change, not
the
Robin Helgelin wrote:
Hi,
I want to save history for a few tables using triggers on update and
creation. What's the best approach to do this in a webapp environment
where I want to save which webapp user that is doing the change, not
the postgresql user?
Well, you haven't told us much about
On Aug 21, 2007, at 12:49 , Josh Trutwin wrote:
SELECT pb_ids FROM pb WHERE id = 123:
pb_id
---
{196,213,215,229,409}
These numbers map to a productid in tblproducts so I figured I could
do this:
SELECT *
FROM tblproducts
WHERE productid = ANY (
On 8/21/07, Guy Rouillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, you haven't told us much about your webapp. Are you using
connection pooling? If so, then you'll need to provide the webapp
userid as an additional parameter to your database updates. If you are
not using connection pooling, such that
I'm preparing a fairly large 7.4.6 DB for trigger-based
replication. I'm looking for ways to minimize my impact on the
existing schema data and uptime. This replication solution
requires every table to have a primary key. Rather than adding
a new key column and index for the pkey, it's
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:19:03 -0500
Michael Glaesemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Out of curiosity, what led to the schema design of storing these
pb_id values in an array rather than in a many-to-many table?
You're working against the database server here. The usual way to
define this
2007/8/21, Josh Trutwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:15:59 +0200
Pavel Stehule [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SELECT * FROM ... WHERE 1000 IN (SELECT pb_ids FROM pb WHERE id=123)
or
SELECT * FROM ... WHERE 1000 = ANY(ARRAY(SELECT pb_ids FROM pb
WHERE id=123))
Thanks -
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 1:22 pm, Robin Helgelin wrote:
Yes, this is where I'm too new to postgresql, how do I tell
the database which user is logged in to the webapp? A session
parameter? There will be connection pooling, but if I know how
to solve the previous question I don't think it's
One difference in SQL syntax is that FireBird could join stored procedures
like this:
SELECT b.*
FROM
get_ids() a
LEFT JOIN get_data(a.ID) ON 1=1
(where a.ID parameter is passed from the previous set as a next procedure
parameter), but Postgres cannot.
On 8/21/07, Tony Caduto [EMAIL
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:36:00 +0200
Pavel Stehule [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it works? no.
pavel=# select 1 from (values(10)) a(i) where i = any((select *
from foo)::int[]);
ERROR: cannot cast type integer to integer[]
LINE 1: ...values(10)) a(i) where i = any((select * from
foo)::int[]);
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 1:42 pm, Ed L. wrote:
Then you could
store the user ID in an update_session_id column and tablelog
would help track of the history.
s/user ID/session ID/g;
Ed
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your
On 8/21/07, Ed L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm preparing a fairly large 7.4.6 DB for trigger-based
replication. I'm looking for ways to minimize my impact on the
existing schema data and uptime. This replication solution
requires every table to have a primary key. Rather than adding
a
Dmitry Koterov wrote:
One difference in SQL syntax is that FireBird could join stored
procedures like this:
SELECT b.*
FROM
get_ids() a
LEFT JOIN get_data(a.ID http://a.ID) ON 1=1
(where a.ID http://a.ID parameter is passed from the previous set as
a next procedure parameter), but
How would you suggest I try to track down this problem?
I run the following query:
SELECT a.* FROM compliance_2006 a, ers_regions b
WHERE a.fips_st_cd=b.fips_st
AND a.fips_cnty_cd=b.fips_cou AND b.region =1
AND a.fips_st_cd='17' AND a.fips_cnty_cd='003';
and it works. But when I try
Steve Wampler wrote:
... Specifically, I'm wondering if it's
possible to add a default rule that would create a new partition
(with indices, etc.) and would add a new rule for this partition
to match the similar ones above (and, of course, then move the
INSERT into the new partition).
I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Wampler wrote:
Steve Wampler wrote:
... Specifically, I'm wondering if it's
possible to add a default rule that would create a new partition
(with indices, etc.) and would add a new rule for this partition
to match the similar ones above
Robin Helgelin wrote:
On 8/21/07, Guy Rouillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, you haven't told us much about your webapp. Are you using
connection pooling? If so, then you'll need to provide the webapp
userid as an additional parameter to your database updates. If you are
not using
On 8/21/07, Bill Thoen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would you suggest I try to track down this problem?
I run the following query:
SELECT a.* FROM compliance_2006 a, ers_regions b
WHERE a.fips_st_cd=b.fips_st
AND a.fips_cnty_cd=b.fips_cou AND b.region =1
AND a.fips_st_cd='17' AND
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 1:45 pm, Scott Marlowe wrote:
If you have a large db in 7.4.6, you should do two things.
1: Update to 7.4.19 or whatever the latest flavor of 7.4 is,
right now. There are a few known data eating bugs in 7.4.6.
Sounds like good advice from a strictly technical
On 8/21/07, Trinath Somanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All ,
I have successfully installed pgcluster 1.7 rc7 and it is working fine . But
i have got a doubt on Single Point Failure .
I need a suggest from u all on this .
we don't see to many pgcluster questions here...you might
On 8/21/07, Ed L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 1:45 pm, Scott Marlowe wrote:
If you have a large db in 7.4.6, you should do two things.
1: Update to 7.4.19 or whatever the latest flavor of 7.4 is,
right now. There are a few known data eating bugs in 7.4.6.
Sounds
I am trying to record the following entries into a table. I'm curious
to know if there's an efficient/effective way of doing this? This
entries come from an ancient datalogger (note: separated by space and
uses YY/MM/DD format to record date)
Plain file sample.dat
3665 OK BS
Hi All ,
I have successfully installed pgcluster 1.7 rc7 and it is working fine .
But i have got a doubt on Single Point Failure .
I need a suggest from u all on this .
For an Application which demands High Availability and no Single Point
Failure and built Multi-Master Replication
On 8/21/07, Guy Rouillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I can't find a way to set a variable associated with a connection,
so probably the easiest thing to do is to add an updated_by column to
your regular table (i.e., the non-history version.) Then just include
the userid from your webapp
Ed L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are there
are any known or obvious gotchas associated with transforming a
unique index on a non null column into a primary key via this
sql?
update pg_index
set indisprimary = 't'
where indexrelid = my non-null unique index oid
The problem with that is
42 matches
Mail list logo
