I want quit milis postgresql.
thank you.
Mulai chatting dengan teman di Yahoo! Pingbox baru sekarang!! Membuat
tempat chat pribadi di blog Anda sekarang sangatlah mudah.
http://id.messenger.yahoo.com/pingbox/
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To
Thank You.
After reindex it's working fine.
Gabor
On Ked, December 9, 2008 23:06, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Schwéger Gábor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is my first post to this list.
Our database moved to a larger partition.
And now I have a problem with a select query:
db=# SELECT id,
I had to do some repeated ad-hoc queries yesterday for a report that was
needed in a hurry, and found myself doing repeated editing of an
embedded function name.
If one wants to store the name of a function in a table for subsequent
use in customised queries is the only way to use it by
I already asked this question on the psql-novice list, but didn't get
any reply. I am aware that this is probably a basic question and hope
someone here can point me in the right direction!
Hi!
I am currently trying my first steps in writing my own functions in C. I
read through the
Tonny Sapri wrote:
I want quit milis postgresql.
There is a form you can fill in here:
http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Hi,
recently Tom Lane wrote:
henry writes:
I have tried setting tcp_keepalives_idle = 120 (eg), then restarting PG,
but SHOW ALL; shows tcp_keepalives_idle=0 (ignoring my setting).
Just FYI, this is the expected behavior on platforms where the kernel
doesn't allow adjustment of the TCP
Hi all,
What is the best way to disallow updates on a column of a table, or even
on a whole table itself?
I can write a BEFORE UPDATE trigger which compares old.column_name(s) to
new.column_name(s) and raise an exception if these values are different.
Are there better ways?
Certain
Hi!
Thanks for your reply. Yes, thats also my suspicion. But what library to
include?
I added /Library/PostgreSQL/8.3/lib/** to my library search path, but it
won't help. If I knew which library I have to add, I think I can figure
out how to properly configure my build settings. Couldn't find
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
As I read it, he is supportive of the community process that PG follows; I
am not so sure he promotes Postgres though :)
I based my comments on discussions I have had with him, not based on his
blog.
--
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://momjian.us
Hi group,
Consider the following simplified table:
create table tbltest(
testid INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
reftotestid INTEGER REFERENCES tbltest(testid),
langid INTEGER
);
INSERT INTO tbltest (testid,reftotestid,langid) VALUES (1,NULL,4);
INSERT INTO tbltest (testid,reftotestid,langid) VALUES
I wonder if I could ask a question which might be marginally off-topic:
how do people assemble multiple lines of text into a row in a table?
I've got a number of cases where I've got a file containing some sort of
activity log, where a sequence of activities extends over multiple lines.
In
Steffn wrote:
I am currently trying my first steps in writing my own functions in C. I
read through the documentation and tried the most simple examples as shown in
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/xfunc-c.html. Sadly
this was already the point where I stumbled. I luckily compiled
Hello,
I've pg_dump'ed a database from PostgreSQL 8.2.6 / openSUSE 10.3
and now trying to load it as a postgres user at 8.1.1 / CentOS 5.2
and get numerous errors like:
CREATE TABLE
ALTER TABLE
CREATE SEQUENCE
ALTER TABLE
psql:denkwerk.sql:1156: ERROR: syntax error at or near OWNED at character
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Alexander Farber
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've pg_dump'ed a database from PostgreSQL 8.2.6 / openSUSE 10.3
and now trying to load it as a postgres user at 8.1.1 / CentOS 5.2
and get numerous errors like:
That's not directly supported. The other
In response to Alexander Farber :
Does anybody please know what's wrong here
(some new syntax introduced in 8.2.x)?
Right.
And what could I do to workaround it
Update your server or edit the dump.
Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -
you should have dump it using pg_dump from 8.1.X. Plus, I don't think
going back is a good idea. There is 8.3 available for centos, use it.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
I added /Library/PostgreSQL/8.3/lib/** to my library search path,
Try to add -L/PostgreSQL/8.3/lib -lpg options to linker's command line.
You can get details with ld --help.
Good luck.
---
Quan Zongliang
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CIT Japan:
Richard Huxton wrote:
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Alternatively I appreciate that I could use PL/pgSQL but that would
assume that if I sent the sequence of operations to somebody else that
he also had it compiled into his server.
Well, pl/pgsql has been automatically included in all recent
Steffn wrote:
Undefined symbols:
_Float8GetDatum, referenced from:
_add_one_float8 in foo.o
ld: symbol(s) not found
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Following the documentation I only added
/Library/PostgreSQL/8.3/include/** to my header search path. What else
do I need to
Don't change thread subjects, it confuses people. Start a new thread
if you have a new topic.
In response to Peter Billen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What is the best way to disallow updates on a column of a table, or even
on a whole table itself?
I can write a BEFORE UPDATE trigger which
Robert Treat wrote:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-04/msg00288.php
I remember after reading this post wondering whether Tom uses caffeinated
soap...
Reading that link, I'm reminded of the tertiary storage code that
somebody (at UCB?) grafted onto the PostgreSQL server.
Thank you for replies, I've decided to upgrade by adding
http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/ to the yum config at my CentOS server
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Alexander Farber
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for replies, I've decided to upgrade by adding
http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/ to the yum config at my CentOS server
We run pgsql 8.3 on Centos 5.2 and are VERY happy with the PGDG rpms on it.
--
Sent via
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Alexander Farber
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for replies, I've decided to upgrade by adding
http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/ to the yum config at my CentOS server
way to go!
--
GJ
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Scott Marlowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We run pgsql 8.3 on Centos 5.2 and are VERY happy with the PGDG rpms on it.
thanks for the confirmation Scott. I have installed PGDG with pgsql 8.2
at my CentOS 5.2 server and it seems to work now. I hope any
Alexander Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've pg_dump'ed a database from PostgreSQL 8.2.6 / openSUSE 10.3
and now trying to load it as a postgres user at 8.1.1 / CentOS 5.2
and get numerous errors like:
In general there is no promise that you can load pg_dump output into
previous server
Steffn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for your reply. Yes, thats also my suspicion. But what library to
include?
There is no library to include --- you need to be building *your* code
as a library that can be loaded into the Postgres backend, which will
supply the missing function. This is
Is there a limit to the number of entries I can pass in an IN clause as
part of a SELECT statement? As in
SELECT baz FROM foo where id in ( 1, 2,... ) ;
Thanks,
-Said
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Liraz Siri wrote:
Solaris is awesome (dtrace rocks!), but I still prefer Debian/Linux for
the same reasons I prefer PostgreSQL over MySQL - its lack of dependence
on any single company.
OpenSolaris?
--
Guy Rouillier
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Said Ramirez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a limit to the number of entries I can pass in an IN clause as part
of a SELECT statement? As in
SELECT baz FROM foo where id in ( 1, 2,... ) ;
I think it's high enough you'd have performance problems before it
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Scott Marlowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Said Ramirez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a limit to the number of entries I can pass in an IN clause as part
of a SELECT statement? As in
SELECT baz FROM foo where id in ( 1, 2,...
Tonny Sapri, 10.12.2008 09:12:
I want quit milis postgresql.
What are quit milis?
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
2008/12/10 Liraz Siri [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Robert Treat wrote:
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 19:43:02 Liraz Siri wrote:
Greg has a good point. Ubuntu is a bit of a moving target. In contrast,
Debian has a much slower release cycle than Ubuntu and is thus
considered by many people to be preferable
Guy Rouillier wrote:
Liraz Siri wrote:
Solaris is awesome (dtrace rocks!), but I still prefer Debian/Linux for
the same reasons I prefer PostgreSQL over MySQL - its lack of dependence
on any single company.
OpenSolaris?
I think it takes more than a license to make a true community
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 6:00 AM, Liraz Siri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guy Rouillier wrote:
Liraz Siri wrote:
Solaris is awesome (dtrace rocks!), but I still prefer Debian/Linux for
the same reasons I prefer PostgreSQL over MySQL - its lack of dependence
on any single company.
OpenSolaris?
2008/12/10 Liraz Siri [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Guy Rouillier wrote:
Liraz Siri wrote:
Solaris is awesome (dtrace rocks!), but I still prefer Debian/Linux for
the same reasons I prefer PostgreSQL over MySQL - its lack of dependence
on any single company.
OpenSolaris?
I think it takes more than
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:pgsql-general-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Emanuel Calvo Franco
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 11:27 AM
To: Liraz Siri; General PostgreSQL List
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] The future of Solaris?
2008/12/10 Liraz Siri [EMAIL
what is this single point of failure?
have you submitted the bug to a JIRA or bugzilla to address this?
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-0552/gbfdy?a=view
If the patch was not in latest distro
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-0552/apa-sparc-23587?a=view
then when will it be scheduled
Damian Carey wrote:
I understand and accept that this is just your opinion, but its sheer
dripping passion tends to highlight its lack objectivity!
and make Solaris completely, utterly obsolete in the not too distant future.
For what it's worth, I really like Solaris. I wish Linux had dtrace
Robert Treat wrote:
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 19:43:02 Liraz Siri wrote:
Greg has a good point. Ubuntu is a bit of a moving target. In contrast,
Debian has a much slower release cycle than Ubuntu and is thus
considered by many people to be preferable for production server
applications.
2008/12/11 Mark Morgan Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I wonder if I could ask a question which might be marginally off-topic: how
do people assemble multiple lines of text into a row in a table?
I've got a number of cases where I've got a file containing some sort of
activity log, where a sequence
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 15:55 -0500, Eric Schwarzenbach wrote:
Robert Treat wrote:
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 19:43:02 Liraz Siri wrote:
Greg has a good point. Ubuntu is a bit of a moving target. In contrast,
Debian has a much slower release cycle than Ubuntu and is thus
considered by
Hello,
While I am currently negotiating where to hold Pg East, it would be
great if we could get some community to help us determine WHEN to hold
Pg East.
There is a very short survey (four or five questions) over at:
http://www.postgresqlconference.org/2009/east/
If I could get responses to
Hi.
I am trying to determine what kind of data replication is currently
available in PostgreSQL. This is for purposes of examining capabilities
of PostgreSQL as compared to other RDBMSs.
I attempted some searches in various areas and came up with a
bewildering array of results but no clear
On Dec 10, 2008, at 2:18 PM, Rutherdale, Will wrote:
Hi.
I am trying to determine what kind of data replication is currently
available in PostgreSQL. This is for purposes of examining
capabilities
of PostgreSQL as compared to other RDBMSs.
I attempted some searches in various areas and
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 17:18 -0500, Rutherdale, Will wrote:
Hi.
I am trying to determine what kind of data replication is currently
available in PostgreSQL. This is for purposes of examining capabilities
of PostgreSQL as compared to other RDBMSs.
I attempted some searches in various areas
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 15:55 -0500, Eric Schwarzenbach wrote:
Robert Treat wrote:
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 19:43:02 Liraz Siri wrote:
Greg has a good point. Ubuntu is a bit of a moving target. In
contrast,
Thanks very much, Steve.
The main (but not only) type of data replication activity I'm interested
in right now would be the warm standby. Thus it appears from the
documents you showed me that log shipping is one solution currently
available in PostgreSQL. I would want to make this work between
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 18:34 -0500, Rutherdale, Will wrote:
Thanks very much, Steve.
The main (but not only) type of data replication activity I'm interested
in right now would be the warm standby. Thus it appears from the
documents you showed me that log shipping is one solution currently
Thanks, Joshua.
As I mentioned to Steve, warm standby / log shipping seems to be the
main feature I'm looking for.
The PITR solution you mention: is that an improvement over regular log
shipping? Or do I misunderstand where that fits into the system?
-Will
-Original Message-
From:
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 18:45 -0500, Rutherdale, Will wrote:
Thanks, Joshua.
As I mentioned to Steve, warm standby / log shipping seems to be the
main feature I'm looking for.
The PITR solution you mention: is that an improvement over regular log
shipping? Or do I misunderstand where that
I need to add some complex constraints at the DB.
For example.
Do not allow a line item of inventory to be changed if it does not
result in the same number of joints originally shipped.
These will involve several tables.
What is the best approach for this?
Here is what I have been trying.
We've done warm standby as you indicate, and we've not needed anything
special.
On the primary's postgresql.conf we use:
archive_command = '~/postgresql/bin/copyWAL %p %f'
Our copyWAL script is just a wrapper for 'scp' since we want to copy the
data encrypted over the network:
#!/bin/bash
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Jason Long
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to add some complex constraints at the DB.
These will involve several tables.
What is the best approach for this?
Well ANSI-SQL provides the CREATE ASSERTION for this purpose.
However, PostgreSQL doesn't support this
Richard Broersma wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Jason Long
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to add some complex constraints at the DB.
These will involve several tables.
What is the best approach for this?
Well ANSI-SQL provides the CREATE ASSERTION for this purpose.
However,
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 05:58:08PM -0600, Jason Long wrote:
I need to add some complex constraints at the DB.
For example.
Do not allow a line item of inventory to be changed if it does not
result in the same number of joints originally shipped.
These will involve several tables.
What
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Maximilian Tyrtania
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
recently Tom Lane wrote:
henry writes:
I have tried setting tcp_keepalives_idle = 120 (eg), then restarting PG,
but SHOW ALL; shows tcp_keepalives_idle=0 (ignoring my setting).
Just FYI, this is the
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
BSD is dying.
We all are, sooner or later ;)
--
Guy Rouillier
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:05 PM, David Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've done warm standby as you indicate, and we've not needed anything
special.
Thanks for sharing your configuation. I have one additional question thought...
How do you handle the reverting? For example.
Say I have a
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 15:21 +1300, Tim Uckun wrote:
What happens when I bring the primary back on line. I now want this to
be primary again and catch up on all the transactions that were sent
to the secondary. I want the secondary to resume it's backup status.
You have to run a new base
Hello Everyone,
I've got a bit of a problem. It started last night when postgres (8.1.9) went
down citing the need
for a vacuum full to be done due to the transaction log needing to wraparound.
So I stopped the server, logged in using a standalone backend and started a
vacuum full analyze on
You have to run a new base backup and have the slave ship logs to the
master.
Mmmm. Does this backup have to be a full backup? What if your database
is very large?
I am hoping to get a setup which is similar to SQL server mirroring.
It uses a witness server to keep track of who got what logs
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Tim Uckun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have to run a new base backup and have the slave ship logs to the
master.
Mmmm. Does this backup have to be a full backup? What if your database
is very large?
Yes. Your backup is very large.
I am hoping to get a
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 20:41 -0700, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Tim Uckun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log shipping doesn't really lends itself to switching back and forth
between masters and slaves.
Really? It seems to me that you can make a base backup just as fast as
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Liraz Siri wrote:
Linux may still be behind Solaris in a few areas but I'll wager Linux
will catch up and make Solaris completely, utterly obsolete in the not
too distant future.
Great, free money is even better than free code; how much would you like
to loo...er, wager
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Phillip Berry wrote:
I've got a bit of a problem. It started last night when postgres
(8.1.9) went down citing the need for a vacuum full to be done due to
the transaction log needing to wraparound.
Not exactly. What it said was To avoid a database shutdown, execute a
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 20:41 -0700, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Tim Uckun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log shipping doesn't really lends itself to switching back and forth
between masters and
Hi Greg,
I appreciate the reply. Fortunately within the last 10 minutes it has finished
the recovery...and
then promptly shut itself down again.
The exact error is in fact:
FATAL: database is not accepting commands to avoid wraparound data loss in
database aim
2008-12-10 06:00:02 CST
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 05:58:08PM -0600, Jason Long wrote:
I need to add some complex constraints at the DB.
For example.
Do not allow a line item of inventory to be changed if it does not
result in the same number of joints originally shipped.
These will involve several tables.
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 21:39 -0700, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 20:41 -0700, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Tim Uckun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log shipping doesn't really lends
Hi,
Am 11.12.2008 2:23 Uhr schrieb Fujii Masao unter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm running pg 8.3.3 on Mac OS 10.4.11 and I'm seeing the same behaviour as
Henry.
I'm trying to find out if Mac OS belongs to those platforms that doesn't
allow adjustment of the TCP keepalive parameters from userspace,
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Phillip Berry wrote:
I'm not running PITR and checkpoint_segments is set to 100 as this is
home to a very write intensive app.
That's weird then. It shouldn't ever keep around more than 201 WAL
segments. I've heard one report of a similarly mysterious excess of them,
72 matches
Mail list logo
