On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 13:18 -0400, Jerry LeVan wrote:
Will the repository be updated for Fedora 13 in the
near future :)
I had to disable the repo because yumex croaks when it
cannot find the repository.
FWIW, I pushed Fedora-13 packages to my repository:
Hi All,
I'm Geoff, a long time postgresql user and been a reasonably regular
participant on #gentoo and #postgresql on freenode for several years
now, helping out new folks where I can. I'm a student (phd) at the
University of Technology, Sydney in Australia. (I've also been a
subscriber to
On 2010-05-30, Martin Gainty wrote:
i have mixed feelings about parameterised statements.
On the one hand a parameterised statement would be more
difficult for a Wireshark criminal to insert their own c**p
into a database because they would have to know the schema
a-priori for example
Hello,
I am migrating a client/server application from Debian Sarge to Debian 5.0 and
I am finding problems with the client application. The facts are the following:
-The client application is an interface to a Postgresql DB so it uses libpq.
-The client application compiles properly in both
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Alonso_Garc=EDa_=2C_Bruno_Elier?= bealo...@indra.es wrote:
And the problems I am finding are the following:
-Queries from the client to the new DB server take a lot of time.
-Queries from the client to the old DB server are fast.
-The same query takes 150 secs in one case an 1
On 2010-05-26, John Gage jsmg...@numericable.fr wrote:
Please forgive this intrusion, and please ignore it, but how many
applications out there have 110,000,000 row tables? I recently
multiplied 85,000 by 1,400 and said now way Jose.
census data would be one.
USA phone whitepages.
On 31/05/2010 5:41 PM, Giles Lean wrote:
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Alonso_Garc=EDa_=2C_Bruno_Elier?=bealo...@indra.es wrote:
And the problems I am finding are the following:
-Queries from the client to the new DB server take a lot of time.
-Queries from the client to the old DB server are fast.
-The
With that analysis, I'd be betting against it being a client problem.
(If you wanted, you might confirm that by pointing an old client at
the new server.)
I'd look into how the data was loaded into the new server and how
the database is configured: number of buffers, indexes, and whether
Hi,
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator. Now we
can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition will be the
best. We would like have access to new versions of Postgres as soon
as possible, for Debian sometimes we had to wait many weeks for
official packages.
On 31/05/2010 10:34 PM, Alonso García , Bruno Elier wrote:
If I perform the query using pgadmin I get the same result in both versions 7.4
and version 8.3.
Please post the output of EXPLAIN ANALYZE for each. See:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SlowQueryQuestions
and
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Michal Szymanski dy...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
Hi,
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator. Now we
can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition will be the
best. We would like have access to new versions of Postgres as soon
as
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Michal Szymanski dy...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
Hi,
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator. Now we
can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition will be the
best. We would like have access to new versions of Postgres as soon
as
On 31/05/2010 10:34 PM, Alonso García , Bruno Elier wrote:
If I perform the query using pgadmin I get the same result in both
versions 7.4 and version 8.3.
Just re-read your post and realized you were probably saying that you
get (effectively) the same EXPLAIN ANALYZE results from both, ie
Michal Szymanski dy...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
Hi,
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator. Now we
can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition will be the
best. We would like have access to new versions of Postgres as soon
With which distribution you are
2010/5/31 Michal Szymanski dy...@poczta.onet.pl
Hi,
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator. Now we
can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition will be the
best. We would like have access to new versions of Postgres as soon
as possible, for Debian sometimes
On Mon, 31 May 2010 08:47:25 -0600
Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Michal Szymanski
dy...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
Hi,
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator.
Now we can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition
2010/5/31 Ivan Sergio Borgonovo m...@webthatworks.it
On Mon, 31 May 2010 08:47:25 -0600
Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Michal Szymanski
dy...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
Hi,
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator.
Now
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Jan Strube j...@deriva.de wrote:
I accidentally encountered a feature in Postgres 8.3 that I couldn't find in
the documentation while submitting a query like
SELECT my_table.varchar FROM my_table
which returns a concatenated string of all field values per
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo m...@webthatworks.it writes:
On Mon, 31 May 2010 08:47:25 -0600
Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
Pgsql is pretty easy to build from source.
Yeah it is. But what is it going to be an upgrade process? On a
production box?
If it makes you feel better, build
You should use whatever you are comfortable with.
I would go with ArchLinux for its ease of use and making packages. RPM
and DPKG are much harder to build than ArchLinux's .pkg.tar.xz
Also, if you install some libraries like python clients or some
software depending on PgSql from the repositories
Richard Broersma richard.broer...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Jan Strube j...@deriva.de wrote:
I accidentally encountered a feature in Postgres 8.3 that I couldn't find in
the documentation while submitting a query like
SELECT my_table.varchar FROM my_table
which
Am 31.05.2010 17:44, schrieb Tom Lane:
Richard Broersmarichard.broer...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Jan Strubej...@deriva.de wrote:
I accidentally encountered a feature in Postgres 8.3 that I couldn't find in
the documentation while submitting a query like
Hi list,
I want to create an install script for a database. First a schema and
its elements are created in a second approach, some adjustments are
done, e.g. create rows, which can be referenced as defaults instead of
having NULL in the referenced column. Below is a minimum non-working
example.
Le lundi 31 mai 2010 10:23:51, Szymon Guz a écrit :
2010/5/31 Ivan Sergio Borgonovo m...@webthatworks.it
On Mon, 31 May 2010 08:47:25 -0600
Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Michal Szymanski
dy...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
Hi,
Hello PG list,
I 'm looking for some tip, advice toimprove PG backups performance,
presently running
pg_dumpall compressed option on raid array 0 getting aprox14GB writes
in 45 min, I'm backing up aprox 200GB database cluster daily .
How can I improve this performance with the present
So PQexec works fine for you on both 7.4 and 8.3, producing a quick
result no matter which server you run it against?
Yes. If I use PQexec, both 7.4 and 8.3 produce a quick result but I if I use
asynchronous command processing 8.3 produce a slow result whereas 7.4 works
fine.
Consider using
Hello,
I'm using PG 8.1.11 on linux and having trouble inserting a timestamp
value (for starters :)) from a C++ program.
The table:
CREATE TABLE test_tbl (ts TIMESTAMP (6) NOT NULL);
Insert works from psql:
INSERT INTO test_tbl VALUES (to_timestamp('20100527101705806216',
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Michal Szymanski dy...@poczta.onet.pl
wrote:
Hi,
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator. Now we
can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition will
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Alonso_Garc=EDa_=2C_Bruno_Elier?= bealo...@indra.es writes:
Yes. If I use PQexec, both 7.4 and 8.3 produce a quick result but I if I use
asynchronous command processing 8.3 produce a slow result whereas 7.4 works
fine.
You're still being quite unclear. Is this 7.4 libpq + 7.4
Viktor Pavlenko v...@cogeco.ca writes:
I'm using PG 8.1.11 on linux and having trouble inserting a timestamp
value (for starters :)) from a C++ program.
The first argument of to_timestamp is not a timestamp ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
TL == Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
TL Viktor Pavlenko v...@cogeco.ca writes:
I'm using PG 8.1.11 on linux and having trouble inserting a
timestamp value (for starters :)) from a C++ program.
TL The first argument of to_timestamp is not a timestamp ...
TL
On Mon, 31 May 2010 17:23:51 +0200
Szymon Guz mabew...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah it is. But what is it going to be an upgrade process? On a
production box?
Any experience to share on upgrading from source on Debian?
Usually that's pretty easy: for upgrading the minor version (e.g.
from 8.3.1
During the install it was recommended that I run the scripts at
PostgresPlus\8.4ss\share\PostgreSQL\contrib
The folder contrib is present holding 78 files. But the PostgreSQL folder is
missing.
Perhaps, that may be of some help?
Also I got the same error on my other computer that is running
Where can I find an example shell script and windows batch file for
archive_command for backup?
Thanks.
Jack
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Jun Wang wrote:
Where can I find an example shell script and windows batch file for
archive_command for backup?
There are no examples. I can be any command you want, like 'COPY'.
--
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.ushttp://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB
Hi Bob,
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Bob Pawley rjpaw...@shaw.ca wrote:
During the install it was recommended that I run the scripts at
PostgresPlus\8.4ss\share\PostgreSQL\contrib
You should run the script against the output of pg_config.exe --sharedir,
which should be C:\Program Files
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 21:14 +0530, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
if you install some libraries like python clients or some
software depending on PgSql from the repositories in RPM/DPKG based
OS, you will have a tough time with the dependency stuff.
Really?
--
Devrim Gündüz dev...@gunduz.org
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 08:47 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
Pgsql is pretty easy to build from source.
Right, but some sysadmins don't want to see development libraries on the
machines.
--
Devrim Gündüz dev...@gunduz.org
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 01:29 -0700, Michal Szymanski wrote:
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator. Now we
can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition will be the
best. We would like have access to new versions of Postgres as soon
as possible, for Debian
On 05/31/2010 11:05 AM, Isabella Ghiurea wrote:
Hello PG list,
I 'm looking for some tip, advice toimprove PG backups performance,
presently running
pg_dumpall compressed option on raid array 0 getting aprox14GB writes in
45 min, I'm backing up aprox 200GB database cluster daily .
How can I
On 05/31/2010 11:00 AM, Wappler, Robert wrote:
Hi list,
I want to create an install script for a database. First a schema and
its elements are created in a second approach, some adjustments are
done, e.g. create rows, which can be referenced as defaults instead of
having NULL in the referenced
Hi Andy,
Thank you , please, see bellow my answers:
Andy Colson wrote:
On 05/31/2010 11:05 AM, Isabella Ghiurea wrote:
Hello PG list,
I 'm looking for some tip, advice toimprove PG backups performance,
presently running
pg_dumpall compressed option on raid array 0 getting aprox14GB writes
On 05/31/2010 02:45 PM, Isabella Ghiurea wrote:
Hi Andy,
Thank you , please, see bellow my answers:
Andy Colson wrote:
On 05/31/2010 11:05 AM, Isabella Ghiurea wrote:
Hello PG list,
I 'm looking for some tip, advice toimprove PG backups performance,
presently running
pg_dumpall compressed
On 05/31/2010 02:45 PM, Isabella Ghiurea wrote:
I 'm looking for some tip, advice to improve PG backups performance,
Yep, I thought I recalled a conversation like this before, this might have some
interesting info:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-03/msg00132.php
Hi,
I'm just try to insert or update an actually table with Microsoft .NET platform
VS2005.
The problem is that de \ dissapear when I make the insert or Update.
If i debug the object has all detailed path...so Why is not saved on the table.
The type of column is character (100).
So:
I have:
On 31 May 2010, at 23:27, david.cata...@1as.es wrote:
Hi,
I'm just try to insert or update an actually table with Microsoft .NET
platform VS2005.
The problem is that de \ dissapear when I make the insert or Update.
Postgres is interpreting those backslashes as escape characters.
I am having difficulties. I have rerun my update that uses the python
functions..
(1) UPDATE nlpg.match_data SET org = normalise(org);
And some other similar queries on neighbouring fields in the table. They
have all now worked. Without any changes to the configuration. I have
done one thing
From: Ashesh Vashi
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 11:33 AM
To: Bob Pawley
Cc: Postgresql ; adrian.kla...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Installing version 8.4
Hi Bob,
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Bob Pawley rjpaw...@shaw.ca wrote:
During the install it was recommended that I run the scripts
On Monday 31 May 2010, Devrim Gündüz dev...@gunduz.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 21:14 +0530, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
if you install some libraries like python clients or some
software depending on PgSql from the repositories in RPM/DPKG based
OS, you will have a tough time with the
Hello
In my environment,archive_command works fine with this command.
archive_command = 'COPY %p C:\\Program
Files\\PostgreSQL\\8.4\\data\\archive\\%f'
(Is this what you want to know?)
Where can I find an example shell script and windows batch file for
archive_command for backup?
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Alan Hodgson ahodg...@simkin.ca wrote:
On Monday 31 May 2010, Devrim Gündüz dev...@gunduz.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 21:14 +0530, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
if you install some libraries like python clients or some
software depending on PgSql from the
Hi,
I run debian/testing since years and it is the best in my opinion.
Besides the fact that new versions come in quite fast (after the wait
phase from unstable to testing) the upgrade for major versions (eg 8.3
to 8.4) is very simple as it does not override the old files but does
a parallel
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Clemens Schwaighofer
clemens_schwaigho...@e-gra.co.jp wrote:
Hi,
I run debian/testing since years and it is the best in my opinion.
Besides the fact that new versions come in quite fast (after the wait
phase from unstable to testing) the upgrade for major
Craig Ringer wrote:
Igor wrote:
Hi All,
Is there an easy way to add c++ files to my simple pgsql module ? My
Makefile
is as follows -
===
MODULES = pg_uservars
DATA_built = pg_uservars.sql
PGXS := $(shell pg_config --pgxs)
include $(PGXS)
===
I've got
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:30, Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote:
Nope; you're wrong. Even RPM doesn't remove the data. But its always
safer to keep a backup.
I am not talking about removing the data I am talking of not beeing
able to access it because the database itself is still in
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
That is great new information. I have created a new documentation
section called Using C++ for Extensibility, and listed you as the
author in the CVS commit; patch attached. Thanks.
Too bad two out of the four pieces of advice are wrong (how many
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
That is great new information. I have created a new documentation
section called Using C++ for Extensibility, and listed you as the
author in the CVS commit; patch attached. Thanks.
Too bad two out of the four pieces of advice
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Personally I would reduce this section to
Don't.
Well, I would have avoided this mine-trap except we have this 9.0
release note item:
Allow use of productnameC++/ functions in backend code (Kurt
Harriman, Peter
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Personally I would reduce this section to
Don't.
Well, I would have avoided this mine-trap except we have this 9.0
release note item:
Allow use of productnameC++/ functions in backend code (Kurt
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Well, I would have avoided this mine-trap except we have this 9.0
release note item:
Allow use of productnameC++/ functions in backend code (Kurt
Harriman, Peter Eisentraut)
So should I just comment it out and then when someone gets serious we
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Well, I would have avoided this mine-trap except we have this 9.0
release note item:
Allow use of productnameC++/ functions in backend code (Kurt
Harriman, Peter Eisentraut)
So should I just comment it out and then when
Joachim Worringen wrote:
my Python application (http://perfbase.tigris.org) repeatedly needs to
insert lots of data into an exsting, non-empty, potentially large
table. Currently, the bottleneck is with the Python application, so I
intend to multi-thread it. Each thread should work on a part
Michal Szymanski wrote:
Currently we use Debian, but it chosen by our OS admnistrator. Now we
can change our OS and it is question what Linux edition will be the
best. We would like have access to new versions of Postgres as soon
as possible, for Debian sometimes we had to wait many weeks for
On 01/06/10 10:48, Tom Lane wrote:
Too bad two out of the four pieces of advice are wrong (how many pieces
of memory managed by the backend are allocated directly with malloc?).
The other two are not wrong as far as they go, but they're certainly
woefully inadequate, because no interesting
On Tuesday 01 June 2010 03.08:06 Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
Besides the fact that new versions come in quite fast (after the wait
phase from unstable to testing)
... and you can always mix testing and unstable. If your testing
installation is not too old, usually not much fiddling with
Heyho!
On Tuesday 01 June 2010 06.01:02 Greg Smith wrote:
Put a little time into learning how to build
your own packages instead, to work around this one perceived flaw, and
you'll be way ahead of the mess that comes with switching distributions
altogether.
Note that we can always use
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 06:59 +0530, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Self compilation has the advantage of custom gcc flags like -O3 -march
-msse, etc. which can improve performance.
I started to think that you have zero idea about building binary
packages.
Building RPMs is not a task that
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 07:20 +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
Packaging stuff for Debian is not magic, it's just Makefiles,
Perl/shell scripts and stuff like this.
Given that *even I* ( :P ) could build a few 8.2 .deb packages for my
previous employer, I also want to confirm that building .debs
2010/6/1 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org:
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 06:59 +0530, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Self compilation has the advantage of custom gcc flags like -O3 -march
-msse, etc. which can improve performance.
I started to think that you have zero idea about building binary
69 matches
Mail list logo
