hi..
when using oracle sqlplus.. we can specify password.
$ sqlplus system/manager
Could you teach me, How can we specify password when using psql
$ psql -p 5432 -h rac2 -d mydb -U hsnoh
Password for user hsnoh:
Thanks..
noh019님의 블로그
안녕하세요.
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:35:58PM +0900, 노현석 wrote:
hi..
when using oracle sqlplus.. we can specify password.
$ sqlplus system/manager
Could you teach me, How can we specify password when using psql
$ psql -p 5432 -h rac2 -d mydb -U hsnoh
Password for user hsnoh:
Thanks..
John Gage schrieb:
So, perhaps what is needed in any sort of battle with MySQL is an
introductory documentation that gives specific examples of how to
achieve oh wow! worthwhile results quickly with Postgres.
I receive my oh wow when i do the same things in Postgres like in
MySQL: Writting
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:00 PM, andi astowo andi.ast...@ymail.com wrote:
Well, that's a pretty big step up. Are you running 7.0, 7.1, 7.2,
7.3, or 7.4? Do you want to go to 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3 or 8.4?
We are running at 7.1 and to go to 8.3.
The normally recommended procedure is to bring up
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 14:49 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
Why can't I see psql there? Is it just because that logging is
performed
just before detecting application name?
Yes. The backend checks whether target database exists, before
processing application name.
Thanks.
Regards,
--
Devrim
On 6 August 2010 16:08, Torsten Zühlsdorff f...@meisterderspiele.de wrote:
I receive my oh wow when i do the same things in Postgres like in MySQL:
Writting some procedures, triggers and use foreign key. The oh wow was
that it just *works*. After some years of using MySQL this is a very
John Gage wrote on 06.08.2010 04:41:
But most people, including myself, don't even want to know the
documentation exists (for anything). We just want to plunge in and do it.
That just doesn't work and is an attitude that won't get you far.
In order to do things properly you need to learn and
On reflection, I think what is needed is a handbook that features cut
and paste code to do the things with Postgres that people do today
with MySQL.
Such a handbook, featured as the first section of the documentation,
would take readers through the steps necessary to set up an online
John Gage schrieb:
On reflection, I think what is needed is a handbook that features cut
and paste code to do the things with Postgres that people do today with
MySQL.
Everyone of my trainees want such thing - for databases, for other
programming-languages etc. It's the worst thing you can
David Fetter da...@fetter.org writes:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:35:58PM +0900, ë
¸íì wrote:
when using oracle sqlplus.. we can specify password.
$ sqlplus system/manager
Could you teach me, How can we specify password when using psql
$ psql -p 5432 -h rac2 -d mydb -U hsnoh
Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:00 PM, andi astowo andi.ast...@ymail.com wrote:
We are sorry but our Postgre 8.3 is bundled with our new RHEL 5.
Say what? Red Hat has never shipped Postgres 8.3 in RHEL.
Currently you can get 8.1 or 8.4 in RHEL-5 (and I'd
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 03:10:30PM +1000, Data Growth Pty Ltd wrote:
Is there any significant performance problem associated with partitioning
a table into 2500 sub-tables? I realise a table scan would be horrendous,
but what if all accesses specified the partitioning criteria sid.
Joshua Tolley eggyk...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 03:10:30PM +1000, Data Growth Pty Ltd wrote:
Is there any significant performance problem associated with partitioning
a table into 2500 sub-tables? I realise a table scan would be horrendous,
but what if all accesses specified
I only said this to criticize it. And I agree completely with Thomas.
John
On Aug 6, 2010, at 2:09 PM, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
John Gage wrote on 06.08.2010 04:41:
But most people, including myself, don't even want to know the
documentation exists (for anything). We just want to plunge in
If I recall correctly William Shakespeare did a ton of cutting and
pasting. And he was not alone. My Fair Lady, one of the most
successful Broadway shows ever, contains whole sections from Shaw's
play.
We learn by imitation. I am not suggesting that once you cut and
paste you call it
I would also enquire whether one thinks that the examples should be
removed from the Postgres documentation for fear that they may be cut
and pasted into an application?
John
On Aug 6, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Torsten Zühlsdorff wrote:
John Gage schrieb:
On reflection, I think what is needed
OK, so if it knew that all vacuumable tuples could be found in 492 pages, and
it scanned only those pages, then how could it be that it reports 16558
removable tuples from those 492 pages, when it has already reported earlier
that it removed 45878 tuples -- a number we know in fact to be correct?
On 10-08-06 11:45 AM, Gordon Shannon wrote:
OK, so if it knew that all vacuumable tuples could be found in 492 pages, and
it scanned only those pages, then how could it be that it reports 16558
removable tuples from those 492 pages, when it has already reported earlier
that it removed 45878
Excerpts from Brad Nicholson's message of vie ago 06 12:01:27 -0400 2010:
On 10-08-06 11:45 AM, Gordon Shannon wrote:
OK, so if it knew that all vacuumable tuples could be found in 492 pages,
and
it scanned only those pages, then how could it be that it reports 16558
removable tuples
Yes, and also from the original post:
3 INFO: scanned index authors_archive_pkey to remove 45878 row
versions
4 DETAIL: CPU 0.05s/0.34u sec elapsed 0.41 sec.
5 INFO: authors_archive: removed 45878 row versions in 396 pages
6 DETAIL: CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec.
Line 5 is
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from Brad Nicholson's message of vie ago 06 12:01:27 -0400 2010:
It found 45878 dead tuples in 396 pages for the index authors_archive_pkey.
It found 16558 dead tuples in 492 pages for the table authors_archive.
But why did it choose
Dear all,
For once, I will simply publish a solution instead of asking a question.
Let's hope it will be useful to someone.
I was unable to stop postgres, I always got [FAILED] :
* /etc/init.d/postgresql stop
* service postgresql stop
* /sbin/service postgresql stop
The only solution that
On Aug 6, 2010, at 6:13 AM, Torsten Zühlsdorff wrote:
John Gage schrieb:
On reflection, I think what is needed is a handbook that features
cut and paste code to do the things with Postgres that people do
today with MySQL.
Everyone of my trainees want such thing - for databases, for
On 6 August 2010 17:49, Denis BUCHER dbuche...@hsolutions.ch wrote:
Dear all,
For once, I will simply publish a solution instead of asking a question.
Let's hope it will be useful to someone.
I was unable to stop postgres, I always got [FAILED] :
* /etc/init.d/postgresql stop
* service
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
On 6 August 2010 17:49, Denis BUCHER dbuche...@hsolutions.ch wrote:
I was unable to stop postgres, I always got [FAILED] :
* /etc/init.d/postgresql stop
* service postgresql stop
* /sbin/service postgresql stop
Surely it depends what the packager put
That last message prints tups_vacuumed, but those other ones are counting
all the removed item pointers. So apparently Gordon had a whole lot of
pre-existing DEAD item pointers. I wonder why ...
Perhaps this will help. Here's the entire test.
Start with a newly loaded table with 5,063,463
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Scott Frankel fran...@circlesfx.com wrote:
On Aug 6, 2010, at 6:13 AM, Torsten Zühlsdorff wrote:
John Gage schrieb:
On reflection, I think what is needed is a handbook that features cut and
paste code to do the things with Postgres that people do today with
john, you're running up against a culture here, and trying to answer
the question: how to make a nerd cool? answer: it can't be done.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:38 PM, zach cruise zachc1...@gmail.com wrote:
john, you're running up against a culture here, and trying to answer
the question: how to make a nerd cool? answer: it can't be done.
I'm all in favor of a nice tutorial section in the docs. But I
certainly don't want pgsql
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 02:09:43PM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
I'm all in favor of a nice tutorial section in the docs. But I
certainly don't want pgsql docs to mimick the mysql docs method of
using a tutorial method for most of the beginner information. It's so
dang hard to find anything I
In my fondest moments, I consider myself a nerd, and when I do I think
I am completely cool.
On Aug 6, 2010, at 9:38 PM, zach cruise wrote:
john, you're running up against a culture here, and trying to answer
the question: how to make a nerd cool? answer: it can't be done.
--
Sent via
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 02:09:43PM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
I'm all in favor of a nice tutorial section in the docs. But I
certainly don't want pgsql docs to mimick the mysql docs method of
using a tutorial method for
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 02:25:27PM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
For an extra added bonus, show a click-path from the front page
mysql.com to the documentation. I gave up and just entered
mysql.com/documentation which kicked off the search engine and let me
click somewhere into the 5.1 docs.
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 02:25:27PM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
For an extra added bonus, show a click-path from the front page
mysql.com to the documentation. I gave up and just entered
mysql.com/documentation which kicked
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 03:57:27PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
- David Kerr d...@mr-paradox.net writes:
- On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 03:49:57PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
- - In recent versions of PG, no. Before about 8.3 it was a Really Bad Idea,
- - because the open transaction would prevent VACUUM from
On 06/08/2010 21:15, Peter Bex wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 02:09:43PM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
I'm all in favor of a nice tutorial section in the docs. But I
certainly don't want pgsql docs to mimick the mysql docs method of
using a tutorial method for most of the beginner information.
On Friday 06 August 2010, Scott Marlowe elucidated thus:
Everyone of my trainees want such thing - for databases, for other
programming-languages etc. It's the worst thing you can give them.
The will copy, they will paste and they will understand nothing.
Learning is the way to
Is there some justification for this behavior that I should know already? It
seemed awfully strange when some folkds here stumbled on it:
$ create user a;
$ create user b;
$ commit;
$ \c - a
$ create table foo (id integer primary key);
$ revoke all on foo from a;
$ grant all on foo to b;
$
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Joshua J. Kugler jos...@eeinternet.comwrote:
So, a getting started guide and/or cookbook would be great. Another
cool idea: a MySQL - PostgreSQL migration guide (I'm sure there's
already one out there) that would show To do *this* MySQL function in
39 matches
Mail list logo
