Hi all,
Could you please give us some typical users that already upgraded to
version 9.0?
We have a debate internally on choosing 8.4 or 9.0 as our product
backend database.
And if you have any performance benchmark result, I will highly appreciate.
Many thanks,
sheldon
--
Sent via
Zhidong She zhidong@gmail.com writes:
We have a debate internally on choosing 8.4 or 9.0 as our product
backend database.
Well, if it's about stability, a look at the commit logs will convince
you that 9.0 and 8.4 branches are now about on par for bug fix rate.
Since 9.0.4, I count 34
akp geek akpg...@gmail.com writes:
After making the required changes to the Primary and slave , I have
restarted the slave and I keep seeing the following in the logs.
*FATAL: could not connect to the primary server: invalid connection option
replication*
That message has to be
I don't have bench marks but upgraded from 8.4 to 9.0 and it works perfect.
No performance issues or problems but I highly recommend 9.0.4!
On Jun 11, 2011 6:56 AM, Zhidong She zhidong@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Could you please give us some typical users that already upgraded to
version
Hey Zhidong,
2011/6/11 Zhidong She zhidong@gmail.com
Hi all,
Could you please give us some typical users that already upgraded to
version 9.0?
We have a debate internally on choosing 8.4 or 9.0 as our product
backend database.
We are switched our current development from 9.0 to 9.1
I'm looking into implementing object-versioning with the added twist of needing
to have both live and draft objects, and could use the insights from someone
experience in this, as I'm beginning to wonder if it's even possible without
potentially horrific hacks.
I'll break it down to posts
Is there a place where I can find comparison in performances of
different postgresql versions, hopefully related to new
feature/improvements?
thanks
--
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks.it
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to
