On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Ondrej Ivanič ondrej.iva...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On 5 September 2012 12:14, Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com wrote:
So people are using PostgreSQL in roles that aren't very visible anyway,
DBA's are usually coming to PostgreSQL from other RDBMS's, and
John R Pierce wrote:
was this a client process or a postgres process? kill -9 on postgres
processes can easily trigger data corruption.
It definitely shouldn't cause data corruption, otherwise
PostgreSQL would not be crash safe.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
Thanks Aleksey,
Definitely worth noting. Impressive scalability according to slides. The
use of Java is particularly interesting to me.
Best regards
Seref
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Aleksey Tsalolikhin atsaloli.t...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi, Seref. You might want to take a look at Stado:
Here's a bit of positive news spin - in a backhanded way perhaps, but still a
compliment:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/08/31/postgresql_too_cool_for_school/
Oliver
www.agilebase.co.uk
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:14:28 -0700
Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com wrote:
So people are using PostgreSQL in roles that aren't very visible
anyway, DBA's are usually coming to PostgreSQL from other RDBMS's,
and few applications are really distributed for PostgreSQL.
I know a bunch of
On 09/05/2012 12:21 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
was this a client process or a postgres process? kill -9 on postgres
processes can easily trigger data corruption.
It certainly shouldn't.
kill -9 of the postmaster, deletion of postmaster.pid, and re-starting
postgresql *might* but AFAIK even
It's not an issue with the replication software. The reason the parts of the
transaction are written out of order is that the original system that writes
them in the first place makes no guarantees as to the order of writing.
So basically my question is whether a trigger that runs a full
Hi,
Has anyone encountered this issue? Why would the WAL receiver process not
stop when postmaster is shutdown?
Any suggestions on how to avoid running into this error or ways to recover
from it?
Thank you in advance for any inputs on this,
Dipti
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Dipti
On Î¤ÎµÏ 05 ΣεÏÏ 2012 10:51:49 Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:14:28 -0700
Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com wrote:
So people are using PostgreSQL in roles that aren't very visible
anyway, DBA's are usually coming to PostgreSQL from other RDBMS's,
and few
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Achilleas Mantzios
ach...@smadev.internal.net wrote:
(single master, 80+ slaves in 80+ vessels in the 7 seas (80+ = 80 and
growning))
Cool!! How do your nodes communicate with each other? Is it an
off-line resynchronization, or do you maintain long-range
== pgBadger 2.0 released ==
''Paris, France - September 5th, 2012''
DALIBO is proud to announce the release of version 2.0 of pgBadger, the
new PostgreSQL log analyzer. pgBadger is built for speed with fully
detailed reports from your PostgreSQL log file. It's a single and small
Perl
I googled around and found that adding/dropping columns from views is not
available. (if not true, I'm all ears).
Given that, what's the best way to do this? I was thinking along the lines of
a stored procedure that reads the view's definition, modifies it, drops the
view, recreates the view.
Craig Ringer ring...@ringerc.id.au writes:
On 09/05/2012 12:21 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
was this a client process or a postgres process? kill -9 on postgres
processes can easily trigger data corruption.
It certainly shouldn't.
kill -9 of the postmaster, deletion of postmaster.pid, and
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Having said that, a kill -9 on an individual backend (*not* the
postmaster) should be safe enough, if you don't mind the fact that
it'll kill all your other sessions too.
Got it, thanks.
Why will it kill all your other
Aleksey Tsalolikhin atsaloli.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Why will it kill all your other sessions too? Isn't there a
separate backend process for each session?
When stopped that abruptly, the process has no chance to clean up
its pending state in shared memory. A fresh copy of shared memory
is
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
Aleksey Tsalolikhin atsaloli.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Why will it kill all your other sessions too? Isn't there a
separate backend process for each session?
When stopped that abruptly, the process has no chance to clean up
its pending state
Dave,
On Wednesday, 5 September 2012 16:16:32 UTC+2, Gauthier, Dave wrote:
I googled around and found that adding/dropping columns from views is not
available. (if not true, I'm all ears).
Given that, what's the best way to do this? I was thinking along the lines
of a stored procedure that
I have searched and searched and just cannot find the maximum lengths for
input variables in a function
i.e.
CREATE FUNCTION test(input1 char(5), input2 varchar(50))
RETURNS void AS
$$RAISE NOTICE('%,%'), $1, $2;$$
LANGUAGE plpgsql;
Where do I find the 5 and the 50 it has to be somewhere I
On Î¤ÎµÏ 05 ΣεÏÏ 2012 23:44:08 Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Achilleas Mantzios
ach...@smadev.internal.net wrote:
(single master, 80+ slaves in 80+ vessels in the 7 seas (80+ = 80 and
growning))
Cool!! How do your nodes communicate with each other? Is it an
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:10 PM, jam3 jamort...@gmail.com wrote:
I have searched and searched and just cannot find the maximum lengths for
input variables in a function
i.e.
CREATE FUNCTION test(input1 char(5), input2 varchar(50))
RETURNS void AS
$$RAISE NOTICE('%,%'), $1, $2;$$
LANGUAGE
2012/9/5 Pavan Deolasee pavan.deola...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:10 PM, jam3 jamort...@gmail.com wrote:
I have searched and searched and just cannot find the maximum lengths for
input variables in a function
i.e.
CREATE FUNCTION test(input1 char(5), input2 varchar(50))
RETURNS
Got it, thanks, Kevin, Tom.
So how about that this process that was in notify interrupt waiting
waiting status after I SIGTERM'ed it. Is the double waiting
expected?
Aleksey
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
jam3 jamort...@gmail.com writes:
I have searched and searched and just cannot find the maximum lengths for
input variables in a function
CREATE FUNCTION test(input1 char(5), input2 varchar(50))
RETURNS void AS
$$RAISE NOTICE('%,%'), $1, $2;$$
LANGUAGE plpgsql;
Where do I find the 5 and
Aleksey Tsalolikhin atsaloli.t...@gmail.com writes:
So how about that this process that was in notify interrupt waiting
waiting status after I SIGTERM'ed it. Is the double waiting
expected?
That sounded a bit fishy to me too. But unless you can reproduce it in
something newer than 8.4.x,
Yeah thats what I was starting to wonder if those lengths basically mean
nothing. I am writing a ton of functions to unit test all of the functions
in our app and am generating random strings and would like to pass the
lengths to my random string generator so if it's varchar 50 I am generating
a
Using 9.1.3
Start Transaction; DO $$ BEGIN raise info '%', txid_current(); END $$; ALTER
TABLE MyCoolTable_1 DISABLE TRIGGER trg_foo_1 ; Commit;
Start Transaction; ALTER
TABLE MyCoolTable_2 DISABLE TRIGGER trg_foo_2 ; Commit;
Start
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Sahagian, David david.sahag...@emc.comwrote:
Why are the Messages displayed by my pgAdmin sql window like this . . .
INFO: 7902
INFO: 7903
INFO: 7904
instead of what I expected . . .
INFO: 7902
INFO: 7904
INFO: 7906
???
Are you sure those ALTER
OK, now I will answer my own question.
It seems that
ALTER TABLE MyCoolTable_1 DISABLE TRIGGER trg_foo_1 ;
is a no-op when it is currently disabled.
And so no txn id is needed.
When I alternate DISable and ENable statements, it behaves as I expect . . .
Start Transaction; DO $$ BEGIN raise
Dear list,
_*Scenario:*_
I'm using PostgreSQL 9.1 on Linux x64 running over CentOS 5. Everything
is fine, but now I do have 4 separate databases running on different
servers, and every server has some shared tables.
I've been working on a complex logic that is able to replicate these
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
That sounded a bit fishy to me too. But unless you can reproduce it in
something newer than 8.4.x, nobody's likely to take much of an interest.
The LISTEN/NOTIFY infrastructure got completely rewritten in 9.0, so
any bugs in
Hi all,
I am using postgres 8.3.9 on SUSE 64 bit. By default max_connections is
100, but I want to know if this can be increased, if so, what should we
take into consideration?
Thank you,
Sireesha
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Modumudi, Sireesha
sireesha.modum...@emc.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am using postgres 8.3.9 on SUSE 64 bit. By default max_connections is 100,
but I want to know if this can be increased, if so, what should we take into
consideration?
If you're considering raising
Here is a bash script I wrote to print out mem config ffrom postgresconf.sql
and os (centos 5.5 in this case). According to Gregory Smith in Postgresql
9.0 shared buffers should be appx 25-40% of avail Physical RAM. Also
considerPostgres uses the OS Buffer as it access the physical data and log
I'm curious under what circumstances Postgres will cache an execution
plan for a query.
Obviously if you create it with the PREPARE statement, it will be cached..
However, if I just run an ad-hoc query such as:
select * from Foo where X 5;
A few hundred times, will that be cached? What if I
jam3 jamort...@gmail.com wrote:
create or replace function test1(c1 char(10), c2 varchar(20))
Just showing that it does indeed not use the length in at all
Correct. That is functioning as intended and is not likely to
change any time soon.
You might consider using domains:
drop
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of jam3
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 3:34 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] Re: Where is the char and varchar length in pg_catalog
for
Duh never mind I call brain cloud on that one, and thanks for all the help.
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Where-is-the-char-and-varchar-length-in-pg-catalog-for-function-input-variables-tp5722845p5722880.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing
This is what I meant to post
drop table test_table;
create table test_table
(
column1 char(20),
column2 varchar(40)
) without oids;
drop function test1(char(10), varchar(20));
create or replace function test1(c1 char(10), c2 varchar(20))
returns void as
$$
BEGIN
insert into
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:16 PM, jam3 jamort...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a bash script I wrote to print out mem config ffrom postgresconf.sql
and os (centos 5.5 in this case). According to Gregory Smith in Postgresql
9.0 shared buffers should be appx 25-40% of avail Physical RAM. Also
How does postgres figure this out to throw the error msg?
create table test_table
(
column1 char(10),
column2 varchar(20)
) without oids;
create or replace function test1(c1 char(10), c2 varchar(20))
returns void as
$$
BEGIN
insert into test_table values ($1, $2);
END
$$
How does postgres figure this out to throw the error msg?
select test1('this is way way longer than 10 characters','this is way way
way
way way way way way way way way way longer than 20 characters')
ERROR: value too long for type character(10)
CONTEXT: SQL statement insert into
David Johnston pol...@yahoo.com wrote:
If you want to guarantee that the INSERT will work you would need
to write:
INSERT INTO test_table VALUES ( $1::char(10), $2::varchar(20) )
Note that this will quietly cut off the tail end of the supplied
data, so it should only be used when that is
MySQL doesn't even support self referential updates like
update t1 set c1 ='value' where t1.id not in (select id from t1 where id
100);
Nor is it fully ACID compliant.
And its online documentation is a nightmare.
PgAdmin is infintely better than mysql workbench, heck anything is better
than
Modumudi, Sireesha sireesha.modum...@emc.com wrote:
I am using postgres 8.3.9 on SUSE 64 bit. By default
max_connections is 100, but I want to know if this can be
increased, if so, what should we take into consideration?
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Number_Of_Database_Connections
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 12:43:15AM +0200, Geert Mak wrote:
There is this case studies section as well -
http://www.postgresql.org/about/casestudies/
Which appear to me a little old and a little too little, one could try to
Em 05/09/2012 15:30, Edson Richter escreveu:
Dear list,
_*Scenario:*_
I'm using PostgreSQL 9.1 on Linux x64 running over CentOS 5.
Everything is fine, but now I do have 4 separate databases running on
different servers, and every server has some shared tables.
I've been working on a
Mike Christensen m...@kitchenpc.com writes:
I'm curious under what circumstances Postgres will cache an execution
plan for a query.
If you're writing raw SQL, never. The assumption is that the
application knows its usage pattern a lot better than the server does,
and if the application is
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Mike Christensen m...@kitchenpc.com writes:
I'm curious under what circumstances Postgres will cache an execution
plan for a query.
If you're writing raw SQL, never. The assumption is that the
application knows its usage
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 21:58 -0400, David Johnston wrote:
On Sep 4, 2012, at 21:39, Sergio Basurto sbasu...@soft-gator.com wrote:
I am using regexp_matches in a function like this
create or replace function test (v_string in text) returns varchar as
$$
declare
i_strings
On Sep 5, 2012, at 19:02, Sergio Basurto sbasu...@soft-gator.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 21:58 -0400, David Johnston wrote:
On Sep 4, 2012, at 21:39, Sergio Basurto sbasu...@soft-gator.com wrote:
I am using regexp_matches in a function like this
create or replace function test
I dunno, perhaps I don't get out the office enough, but I just don't
hear about MySQL any more.
I think this thread is tilting at windmills.
A few years ago about 1 in 2 contracts we had was with a start-up using
MySQL.
The other half were using either PG or Oracle or SQLServer. The years
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Achilleas Mantzios
ach...@smadev.internal.net wrote:
On Τετ 05 Σεπτ 2012 10:51:49 Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:14:28 -0700
Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com wrote:
So people are using PostgreSQL in roles that aren't very
Regarding MySQL vs PostgreSQL:
MySQL is what you get when app developers build a database server.
PostgreSQL is what you get when db developers build a development platform.
There really isn't anything more to say about it.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Andy Yoder ayo...@airfacts.com wrote:
Hello all,
I would like the community's input on a topic. The words too far out of
the mainstream are from an e-mail we received from one of our clients,
describing the concern our client's IT group has about our use of
Em 05/09/2012 23:49, Chris Travers escreveu:
Regarding MySQL vs PostgreSQL:
MySQL is what you get when app developers build a database server.
PostgreSQL is what you get when db developers build a development
platform.
There really isn't anything more to say about it.
This kind of claim is
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Edson Richter edsonrich...@hotmail.com wrote:
Em 05/09/2012 23:49, Chris Travers escreveu:
Regarding MySQL vs PostgreSQL:
MySQL is what you get when app developers build a database server.
PostgreSQL is what you get when db developers build a development
According to
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/kernel-resources.html
The maximum shared memory usage of a connection in bytes is
1800 + 270 * max_locks_per_transaction
max_locks_per_transaction default is 64
19080 Bytes
or .018 mb's per connection
or
1.819 mb at 100 default
Em 06/09/2012 00:39, Scott Marlowe escreveu:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Edson Richter edsonrich...@hotmail.com wrote:
Em 05/09/2012 23:49, Chris Travers escreveu:
Regarding MySQL vs PostgreSQL:
MySQL is what you get when app developers build a database server.
PostgreSQL is what you get
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Edson Richter edsonrich...@hotmail.comwrote:
Em 05/09/2012 23:49, Chris Travers escreveu:
Regarding MySQL vs PostgreSQL:
MySQL is what you get when app developers build a database server.
PostgreSQL is what you get when db developers build a development
59 matches
Mail list logo
